Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386678›Full record

ArticleJournal of biometrics & biostatistics2018

Power Estimation in Planning Randomized Two-Arm Pre-Post Intervention Trials with Repeated Longitudinal Outcomes.

Yirui Hu, Donald R Hoover

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biometrics & biostatistics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Utility of Advanced Microbiology Testing Tools.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yirui HuBiomedical and Translational Informatics, Geisinger, Danville, 17821, USA.
Donald R HooverDepartment of Statistics and Biostatistics and the Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, Piscataway, 08854, USA.

Funding

Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS-V)U01AI035004 · NIAID · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI ANASTOS, KATHRYN M., SHARMA, ANJALI · 1993 to 2018
$65.7M
"Enhancing Cancer Research in Central Africa IeDEA"U01AI096299 · NIAID · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI Denis Nash, Marcel Yotebieng · 2011 to 2026
$35.8M
Reducing urban women's HIV risk: Soap opera videos streamed to mobile devicesR01NR014632 · NINR · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, RACHEL · 2015 to 2018
$2.0M
Acute Effects of Cannabis on Cognition and Mobility in Older HIV-Infected and Uninfected Women"R21AG059505 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI SHARMA, ANJALI · 2018 to 2019
$318k
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI035004NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI096299NIA NIH HHS R21 AG059505NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntervention effect on ongoing medical processes is estimated from clinical trials on units (i.e. persons or facilities) with fixed timing of repeated longitudinal measurements. All units start out untreated. A randomly chosen subset is switched to the intervention at the same time point. The pre-post switch change in the outcome between these units and unswitched controls is compared using Generalized Least Squares models. Power estimation for such studies is hindered by lack of available GLS based approaches and normative data.

methodsWe derive Generalized Least Squares variance of the intervention effect. For the commonly assumed compound symmetry correlation structure, this leads to simple power formulas with important optimality properties. To maximize power given a constrained number of total time points, we investigate on the optimal pre-post allocation with the local minimization of variance.

resultsIn four examples from nursing home and HIV patients, the Toepltiz within-unit correlation of repeated measures differed from compound symmetry. We applied empirical Toeplitz based calculations for variance of the estimated intervention effect to these examples (each with up to seven longitudinal measures). Unlike what happened under compound symmetry, where power was often maximized with multiple observations being pre-intervention, for these examples, having one pre-intervention measure tended to maximize power. Attempts to approximate the Toeplitz variance structures with compound symmetry (to take advantage of the simpler formulas) resulted in overestimation of power for these examples.

conclusionsWhile compound symmetry correlation among repeated within-unit measures leads to simple power estimation formulas, this structure often did not hold. There may be strong underestimation of variance of the intervention effect estimate from incorporating short-term within-unit correlation estimates as a common compound symmetry correlation to approximate an unknown Toeplitz correlation without adequately accounting for the correlation between repeated measures declining with time.

Indexed as

Compound symmetryGeneralized least squaresMixed modelOptimal allocationPower and sample size estimationPre-post interventional studyToeplitz correlation

Identifiers

PMID30386678
PMCPMC6207205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.