Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386510›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2018

Current understanding of genetic polymorphisms as biomarkers for risk of biological complications in implantology.

Asier Eguia Del Valle, José López-Vicente, Rafael Martínez-Conde, Luis-Antonio Aguirre-Zorzano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asier Eguia Del ValleAssociate Professor. DDS, PhD.Departamento Estomatología II, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería. Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU). // Stomatology II Department, Faculty of Medicine and Nursering. University of the Basque country (UPV/EHU). Leioa (Vizcaya) Spain.
José López-VicenteAssociate Professor. MD, DDS, PhD, Departamento Estomatología II, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería. Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU). // Stomatology II Department, Faculty of Medicine and Nursering. University of the Basque country (UPV/EHU). Leioa (Vizcaya) Spain.
Rafael Martínez-CondeProfessor. MD, DDS, PhD, Departamento Estomatología II, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería. Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU). // Stomatology II Department, Faculty of Medicine and Nursering. University of the Basque country (UPV/EHU). Leioa (Vizcaya) Spain.
Luis-Antonio Aguirre-ZorzanoProfessor. MD,DDs, PhD. Departamento Estomatología II, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería. Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU). // Stomatology II Department, Faculty of Medicine and Nursering. University of the Basque country (UPV/EHU). Leioa (Vizcaya) Spain. Director of Master of Periodontology at the University of The Basque Country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the last decade, multiple studies have been published that analyze the relationship between the risk of experiencing biological complications with implants and the presence of certain types of genetic polymorphisms. In the present report, we analyze the controversies that have arisen from this important area of investigation and synthesize the most prominent aspects of knowledge related to this possible etiopathogenic relationship. MATERIAL AND

methodsFor this review, the biomedical databases PubMed-Medline, SciELO, and DOAJ were used. Different search strategies were employed, from which 298 articles initially emerged. After refinement of the search, 55 articles published between 2002 and 2018 were finally selected based on relevance.

resultsIn certain population groups, there is evidence to support that about a dozen polymorphisms could in some way be related to biological complications in implantology. Indeed, the results may vary according to the ethnic origin of the population studied. Most of the published investigations are initial studies reporting small sample sizes and utilizing different study group homogenization methods. We are still at a preliminary stage of our understanding and development with regard to these types of biomarkers. The interesting results identified indicate that new investigations will be necessary to eliminate the biases observed in some studies and to homogenize the research groups. In order to clarify the controversies surrounding the current knowledge in this field, we believe that it will be necessary to employ larger study groups and search for possible synergistic effects between different polymorphisms.

Identifiers

PMID30386510
PMCPMC6203903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.