Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386412›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2018

Time-to-event analysis to evaluate dormancy status of single-bud cuttings: an example for grapevines.

Hector Camargo Alvarez, Melba Salazar-Gutiérrez, Diana Zapata, Markus Keller, Gerrit Hoogenboom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hector Camargo Alvarez1AgWeatherNet Program, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350 USA.
Melba Salazar-Gutiérrez1AgWeatherNet Program, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350 USA.
Diana Zapata1AgWeatherNet Program, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350 USA.
Markus Keller2Department of Horticulture, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350 USA.
Gerrit Hoogenboom1AgWeatherNet Program, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reduced growth of plants during the winter causes a lack in the perceptibility of the phenological events making challenging the study of dormancy. For deciduous crops, dormancy is generally determined by evaluating budbreak of single-node cuttings that are exposed to conditions suitable for growth. However, the absence of a statistical basis for analyzing and interpreting the budbreak behavior evaluated as the percent budbreak, the average time to budbreak and the time to reach 50% budbreak, has caused inconsistent and contradictory criteria to identify the dormancy status of different deciduous crops.

resultsIn this study, a method was developed to analyze the duration between sampling and budbreak of single-node cuttings and to estimate the dormancy status for grapevines (

conclusionThe approach described in this study provided a comparison of the budbreak distribution of cuttings collected during distinct phases with a confidence of 95%. It also allowed the estimation of the date of occurrence of the dormancy stages for two grapevine cultivars 'Cabernet Sauvignon' and 'Chardonnay,' based on the variability within the sampling season rather than on fixed arbitrary criteria. This approach can also be used to analyze budbreak data of single-node cuttings from other common deciduous crops.

Indexed as

BudbreakCabernet SauvignonChardonnayEcodormancyEndodormancyParadormancyPhenologySurvival analysisVitis vinifera L.

Identifiers

PMID30386412
PMCPMC6203998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.