Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386168›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2018

Survey of mosquito-borne flaviviruses in the Cuitzmala River Basin, Mexico: do they circulate in rodents and bats?

Jesús Sotomayor-Bonilla, Omar García-Suárez, Nohemí Cigarroa-Toledo, Rosa C Cetina-Trejo, Ana C Espinosa-García, Rosa E Sarmiento-Silva, Carlos Machain-Williams, Diego Santiago-Alarcón, Marisa Mazari-Hiriart, Gerardo Suzán

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Wildlife susceptibility to infectious diseases at global scales.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Absence of yellow fever virus circulation in wildlife rodents from Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jesús Sotomayor-Bonilla1Programa de Maestría y Doctorado en Ciencias de la Producción y de la Salud Animal, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito interior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Mexico City Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4756-8985
Omar García-Suárez2Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades y Una Salud, Departamento de Etología, Fauna Silvestre y Animales de Laboratorio, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Interior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Mexico City Mexico.
Nohemí Cigarroa-Toledo5Laboratorio de Arbovirología, Centro de Investigaciones Regional "Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán , Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.
Rosa C Cetina-Trejo5Laboratorio de Arbovirología, Centro de Investigaciones Regional "Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán , Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.
Ana C Espinosa-García4Laboratorio Nacional de Ciencias de la Sostenibilidad, Instituto de Ecología,, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n anexo Jardín Botánico exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Mexico City Mexico.
Rosa E Sarmiento-Silva6Departamento de Microbiología e Inmunología, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito interior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Mexico City México.
Carlos Machain-Williams5Laboratorio de Arbovirología, Centro de Investigaciones Regional "Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán , Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.
Diego Santiago-AlarcónAsociación Mexicana de Medicina de la Conservación Kalaan Kab, A.C., Ciclistas 63 Col. Country Club, Coyoacán, Mexico City Mexico.
Marisa Mazari-Hiriart4Laboratorio Nacional de Ciencias de la Sostenibilidad, Instituto de Ecología,, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n anexo Jardín Botánico exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Mexico City Mexico.
Gerardo Suzán2Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades y Una Salud, Departamento de Etología, Fauna Silvestre y Animales de Laboratorio, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Interior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Mexico City Mexico.
Asociación Mexicana de Psicología y Desarrollo Comunitario · MXAutonomous University of Yucatán · MXInstituto de Ecología · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA viruses commonly infect bats and rodents, including mosquito-borne flaviviruses (MBFV) that affect human and animal health. Serological evidence suggests past interactions between these two mammalian orders with dengue viruses (DENV), West Nile virus (WNV), and yellow fever virus (YFV). Although in Mexico there are reports of these viruses in both host groups, we know little about their endemic cycles or persistence in time and space.

methodsRodents and bats were captured at the Cuitzmala River Basin on the Pacific coast of Jalisco state, Mexico, where MBFV, such as DENV, have been reported in both humans and bats. Samples were taken during January, June, and October 2014, at locations adjacent to the river. Tissue samples were collected from both bats and rodents and serum samples from rodents only. Highly sensitive serological and molecular assays were used to search for current and past evidence of viral circulation.

resultsOne thousand nine hundred forty-eight individuals were captured belonging to 21 bat and 14 rodent species. Seven hundred sixty-nine liver and 764 spleen samples were analysed by means of a specific molecular protocol used to detect flaviviruses. Additionally, 708 serum samples from rodents were examined in order to demonstrate previous exposure to dengue virus serotype 2 (which circulates in the region). There were no positive results with any diagnostic test. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first survey of rodents and only the second survey of bats from the Pacific Coast of Mexico in a search for MBFV. We obtained negative results from all samples. We validated our laboratory tests with negative and positive controls. Our findings are consistent with other empirical and experimental studies in which these mammalian hosts may not replicate mosquito-borne flaviviruses or present low prevalence.

conclusionsTrue-negative results are essential for the construction of distribution models and are necessary to identify potential areas at risk. Negative results should not be interpreted as the local absence of MBFV in the region. On the contrary, we need to establish a long-term surveillance programme to find MBFV presence in the mosquito trophic networks, identifying the potential role of rodents and bats in viral dynamics.

Indexed as

ArbovirusesBatDengueHost-virus interactionRodentWest Nile virus

Identifiers

PMID30386168
PMCPMC6201526
OpenAlexW2898434823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.