Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386162›Full record

ReviewZooKeys2018

Description of a new species of

Lujza Keresztes, Jesús Martínez Menéndez, Luis Martin, Edina Török, Levente-Péter Kolcsár

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ZooKeys, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lujza KeresztesHungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Centre of Systems Biology, Biodiversity and Bioresources, Faculty of Biology and Geology, University of Babeș-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca, Clinicilor 5-7, Romania University of Babeș-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca Romania.
Jesús Martínez MenéndezDepartment Zoología, Antropología Física & Genética, Faculty of Biology, University of Santiago de Compostela, R/Lope Gómez de Marzoa, s/n. Campus Vida. 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain University of Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain.
Luis MartinDepartment Zoología, Antropología Física & Genética, Faculty of Biology, University of Santiago de Compostela, R/Lope Gómez de Marzoa, s/n. Campus Vida. 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain University of Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain.
Edina TörökHungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Centre of Systems Biology, Biodiversity and Bioresources, Faculty of Biology and Geology, University of Babeș-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca, Clinicilor 5-7, Romania University of Babeș-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca Romania.
Levente-Péter KolcsárRomanian Academy Institute of Biology, Splaiul Independenţei 296, 060031 Bucureşti, Romania Romanian Academy Institute of Biology Bucureşti Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new species of the TipulasubgenusMediotipula is described from the south-eastern part of Albania, south-eastern Europe. Morphologically, the new species is most similar to T. (M.) stigmatella Schummel, 1833, but differs mainly with respect to males, having a distinctly shaped posterior margin of tergite 9-10, a widened outer gonostylus and a series of details of the inner gonostylus (anterior end of the anterior arm, shape of the posterior arm), as well as having more bulbous and rounded hypogynal valves in the females. Further morphological differences of the male terminalia between allopatric populations of T. (M.) stigmatella in the Carpathians and Balkans, south-eastern Europe, are discussed.

Indexed as

CranefliesMediotipulaMediterranean hotspotsmorphological diversitynew speciesthe Balkans

Identifiers

PMID30386162
PMCPMC6207631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.