ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2018
Smoking and Other Risk Factors in Individuals With Synchronous Conventional High-Risk Adenomas and Clinically Significant Serrated Polyps.
Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes and Characteristics Across Age Groups of Patients with Positive MT-sDNA Stool Tests: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Yield of Synchronous Adenomas and Serrated Polyps in Patients With Positive Stool Tests (mt-sDNA or FIT): Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Association Between Serrated Polyps on Index Examination and Advanced Findings Detected on the Second Surveillance Colonoscopy: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Anatomical location of colorectal neoplasia in patients with positive stool test (multitarget stool deoxyribonucleic acid or fecal immunochemical test) results: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Article
- Risk of advanced adenoma detection in colorectal cancer screening programmes according to personal characteristics and screening history.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Endoscopic characterization and development of a prediction model for colorectal adenomatous polyps.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting 3-year recurrence of adenomatous colorectal polyps after EMR: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Association Between Smoking Status and Prevalence of Advanced Outcomes in Patients With and Without Positive Stool Test Prior to Colonoscopy: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Prognostic Differences Between Early-Onset and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Anatomical Distribution of Polyps Is Different for Men and Women With Positive Stool Tests.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Which is the better polyp detection metric: adenomas per colonoscopy or adenoma detection rate? A simulation modeling study.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Association of Endoscopist Colonoscopy Quality Measures With Follow-Up Colonoscopy Outcomes After Positive Stool Tests (Multitarget Stool DNA or Fecal Immunochemical Test): Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis of Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Different modifiable risk factors for the development of non-advanced adenoma, advanced adenomatous lesion, and sessile serrated lesions, on screening colonoscopy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Clinicopathologic and endoscopic features of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas: a large inpatient population-based study in China.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Colorectal Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Delayed but Not Forgotten.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- [Obesity and Colorectal Cancer].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2023Review
- Serrated Polyp Yield at Colonoscopy in Patients with Positive FIT, Positive mt-sDNA, and Colonoscopy Only: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023Article
- Colonoscopy Findings in FIT+ and mt-sDNA+ Patients versus in Colonoscopy-only Patients: New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Data.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2022Article
- Colonoscopy utilization and outcomes in older adults: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsSerrated polyps (SPs) and conventional high-risk adenomas (HRAs) derive from two distinct biological pathways but can also occur synchronously. Adults with synchronous SPs and adenomas have been shown to be a high-risk group and may have a unique risk factor profile that differs from adults with conventional HRAs alone. We used the population-based New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry (NHCR) to examine the risk profile of individuals with synchronous conventional HRAs and SPs.
methodsOur study population included 20,281 first time screening colonoscopies from asymptomatic NHCR participants 40 years or older between 2004-15. Exams were categorized by findings: (1) normal, (2) HRA only (adenomas ≥ 1 cm, villous, high grade dysplasia, multiple adenomas ( > 2) and adenocarcinoma), (3) clinically significant SP (CSSP) only (any hyperplastic polyp ≥ 1 cm, sessile serrated adenomas/polyps or traditional serrated adenomas), and (4) synchronous HRA + CSSP. Risk factors examined included exposure of interest, smoking (never, past, and current/pack years), as well as age, sex, alcohol, education, and family history of colorectal cancer (CRC). Multivariable unconditional logistic regression tested the relation of risk factors with having synchronous HRA + CSSP versus having a normal exam or HRA alone.
resultsAmong NHCR participants with 18,354 screening colonoscopies (with complete smoking, sex, bowel preparation data, and adequate preparation) there were 16,495 normal; 1309 HRA alone; 461 CSSP alone, and 89 synchronous HRA + CSSP. Current smoking was associated with an almost threefold increased risk for HRA or CSSP, and an eightfold risk for synchronous HRA + CSSP (aOR = 8.66; 95% CI: 4.73-15.86) compared to normal exams. Adults with synchronous HRA + CSSP were threefold more likely to be current smokers than those with HRA alone (aOR = 3.27; 95% CI:1.74-6.16).
conclusionsOur data suggest that current smokers may be at a higher risk for synchronous CSSP + HRA even when compared to having HRA alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.