Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30385814›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Ophirina amphinema n. gen., n. sp., a New Deeply Branching Discobid with Phylogenetic Affinity to Jakobids.

Akinori Yabuki, Yangtsho Gyaltshen, Aaron A Heiss, Katsunori Fujikura, Eunsoo Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Foraging mechanisms in excavate flagellates shed light on the functional ecology of early eukaryotes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. EukRef-excavates: seven curated SSU ribosomal RNA gene databases.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The unity and diversity of the ciliary central apparatus.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Akinori YabukiDepartment of Marine Biodiversity Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokosuka, Japan. yabukia@jamstec.go.jp.
Yangtsho GyaltshenDivision of Invertebrate Zoology and Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.
Aaron A HeissDivision of Invertebrate Zoology and Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4987-7439
Katsunori FujikuraDepartment of Marine Biodiversity Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokosuka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7877-4055
Eunsoo KimDivision of Invertebrate Zoology and Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. ekim1@amnh.org.
American Museum of Natural History · USJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a novel nanoflagellate, Ophirina amphinema n. gen. n. sp., isolated from a lagoon of the Solomon Islands. The flagellate displays 'typical excavate' morphological characteristics, such as the presence of a ventral feeding groove with vanes on the posterior flagellum. The cell is ca. 4 µm in length, bears two flagella, and has a single mitochondrion with flat to discoid cristae. The flagellate exists in two morphotypes: a suspension-feeder, which bears flagella that are about the length of the cell, and a swimmer, which has longer flagella. In a tree based on the analysis of 156 proteins, Ophirina is sister to jakobids, with moderate bootstrap support. Ophirina has some ultrastructural (e.g. B-fibre associated with the posterior basal body) and mtDNA (e.g. rpoA-D) features in common with jakobids. Yet, other morphological features, including the crista morphology and presence of two flagellar vanes, rather connect Ophirina to non-jakobid or non-discobid excavates. Ophirina amphinema has some unique features, such as an unusual segmented core structure within the basal bodies and a rightward-oriented dorsal fan. Thus, Ophirina represents a new deeply-branching member of Discoba, and its mosaic morphological characteristics may illuminate aspects of the ancestral eukaryotic cellular body plan.

Indexed as

PhylogenyEukaryotaGenes, MitochondrialGenome, MitochondrialGenomicsRNA, Ribosomal, 18SRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID30385814
PMCPMC6212452
OpenAlexW2898102573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.