Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30385790›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The effect of anxiety on emotional recognition: evidence from an ERP study.

Qianqian Yu, Qian Zhuang, Bo Wang, Xingze Liu, Guang Zhao, Meng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Human Responses to Visually Evoked Threat.Current biology : CB · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qianqian YuResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China.
Qian ZhuangResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China.
Bo WangCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, 450001, China.
Xingze LiuResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China.
Guang ZhaoResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China. zhaoguang721@163.com.
Meng ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Xinxiang Medical University, Henan, 453003, China. mengzhang.1985@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety-related bias in the recognition memory based on trait anxiety has induced some studies. Their results, however, were conflicting. In fact, anxious differences not only differed from personality traits but also from different anxiety mood levels. We explored the emotional memory bias in both trait and state anxiety individuals, the high trait and high state anxiety group, the high trait and low state anxiety group, the low trait and high state anxiety group, and the low trait and low state anxiety group, on classic recognition paradigm using event-related potentials (ERPs). The behavioral results showed high state anxiety levels increased the d' of negative words, regardless of the trait anxiety of participant is high or low, and a lower d' of recognition memory for negative words than for neutral and positive words in all participants. Moreover, Electrophysiological results supported the findings of behavior, showing an earlier N400 (250-500 ms) latency elicited for new-negative words in high state level than in low state levels in right parietal region. These results suggested that the memory bias to negative events resides in state anxiety, but not in trait anxiety.

Indexed as

AdultAffectAnxietyAttentionBrainBrain MappingEmotionsEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMemoryPersonality

Identifiers

PMID30385790
PMCPMC6212571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.