Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30385733›Full record

Trial reportJCI insight2018

Tumor fraction in cell-free DNA as a biomarker in prostate cancer.

Atish D Choudhury, Lillian Werner, Edoardo Francini, Xiao X Wei, Gavin Ha, Samuel S Freeman, Justin Rhoades, Sarah C Reed, Gregory Gydush, Denisse Rotem and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in JCI insight, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. plasmaCHORD: A Machine Learning Approach to Distinguish Clonal Hematopoiesis-Derived Variants in Liquid Biopsies from Patients with Solid Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Atish D ChoudhuryDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lillian WernerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Edoardo FranciniDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Xiao X WeiDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gavin HaDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Samuel S FreemanEli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Justin RhoadesEli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Sarah C ReedEli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Gregory GydushEli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Denisse RotemEli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Christopher LoEli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Mary-Ellen TaplinDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lauren C HarshmanDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Zhenwei ZhangDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Edward P O'ConnorDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Daniel G StoverThe Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Heather A ParsonsDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gad GetzEli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Matthew MeyersonDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Christopher LoveEli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
William C HahnDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Viktor A AdalsteinssonEli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Broad Institute · USHarvard University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

VIRUS PRODUCTION COREP30CA014051 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Paula T Hammond · 1985 to 2026
$93.9M
Tumor and Circulating Markers as Links Between Obesity and Lethal Prostate CanceP50CA090381 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI KANTOFF, PHILIP W · 2002 to 2017
$36.2M
Training Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative GenomicsT32HG002295 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Peter J Park · 2001 to 2026
$15.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014051NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090381NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor content in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising biomarker, but longitudinal dynamics of tumor-derived and non-tumor-derived cfDNA through multiple courses of therapy have not been well described.

methodsCfDNA from 663 plasma samples from 140 patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) was subject to sparse whole genome sequencing. Tumor fraction (TFx) estimated using the computational tool ichorCNA was correlated with clinical features and responses to therapy.

resultsTFx associated with the number of bone metastases (median TFx = 0.014 with no bone metastases, 0.047 with 1-3 bone metastases, 0.190 for 4+ bone metastases; P < 0.0001) and with visceral metastases (P < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, TFx remained associated with metastasis location (P = 0.042); TFx was positively correlated with alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.0227) and negatively correlated with hemoglobin (Hgb) (P < 0.001), but it was not correlated with prostate specific antigen (PSA) (P = 0.75). Tumor-derived and non-tumor-derived cfDNA track together and do not increase with generalized tissue damage from chemotherapy or radiation at the time scales examined. All new treatments that led to ≥30% PSA decline at 6 weeks were associated with TFx decline when baseline TFx was >7%; however, TFx in patients being subsequently maintained on secondary hormonal therapy was quite dynamic.

conclusionTFx correlates with clinical features associated with overall survival in CRPC, and TFx decline is a promising biomarker for initial therapeutic response.

trial registrationDana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (DF/HCC) protocol no. 18-135.

fundingWong Family Award in Translational Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute Medical Oncology grant, Gerstner Family Foundation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Koch Institute Support (core) grant P30-CA14051 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Indexed as

Alkaline PhosphataseAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorBone NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsChemoradiotherapyCirculating Tumor DNAHemoglobinsHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm MetastasisProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantSurvival AnalysisAlkaline PhosphataseAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAHemoglobinsProstate-Specific AntigenOncologyProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID30385733
PMCPMC6238737
OpenAlexW2899109449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.