Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30385467›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Interaction of Developmental Venous Anomalies with Resting-State Functional MRI Measures.

B Sundermann, B Pfleiderer, H Minnerup, K Berger, G Douaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B SundermannFrom the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (B.S., G.D.), Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK benedikt.sundermann@uni-muenster.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4390-3464
B PfleidererInstitute of Clinical Radiology (B.S., B.P.), Medical Faculty, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1238-6225
H MinnerupDepartment of Epidemiology and Social Medicine (H.M., K.B.), University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9706-7599
K BergerDepartment of Epidemiology and Social Medicine (H.M., K.B.), University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8966-3684
G DouaudFrom the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (B.S., G.D.), Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1981-391X

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006673/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeFunctional MR imaging of the brain, used for both clinical and neuroscientific applications, relies on measuring fluctuations in blood oxygenation. Such measurements are susceptible to noise of vascular origin. The purpose of this study was to assess whether developmental venous anomalies, which are frequently observed normal variants, can bias fMRI measures by appearing as true neural signal. MATERIALS AND

methodsLarge developmental venous anomalies (1 in each of 14 participants) were identified from a large neuroimaging cohort (

resultsOf the 14 developmental venous anomalies identified, 10 were clearly present in 17 fMRI independent components in total. While 9 (52.9%) of these 17 independent components were dominated by venous contributions and 2 (11.8%) by motion artifacts, 2 independent components (11.8%) showed partial neural signal contributions and 5 independent components (29.4%) unambiguously exhibited typical neural signal patterns.

conclusionsDevelopmental venous anomalies can strongly resemble neural signal as measured by fMRI. They are thus a potential source of bias in fMRI analyses, especially when present in the cortex. This could impede interpretation of local activity in patients, such as in presurgical mapping. In scientific studies with large samples, developmental venous anomaly confounds could be mainly addressed using independent component analysis-based denoising.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAdultBrainCerebral VeinsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMale

Identifiers

PMID30385467
PMCPMC6476411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.