Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30384841›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Intensive home care packages for people with dementia: a realist evaluation protocol.

Fiona Keogh, Maria Pierce, Karen Neylon, Padraic Fleming

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring Resilience in UK-Based Domiciliary Care Workers before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fiona KeoghCentre for Economic and Social Research on Dementia (CESRD), ILAS Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland. fiona.keogh@nuigalway.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1400-1947
Maria PierceGenio, 19-21 Westland Square, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Karen NeylonGenio, 19-21 Westland Square, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Padraic FlemingHealth Intelligence Unit, HSE Dr Steevens Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.

Funding

Department of Health Ireland #23262Health Service Executive #23262The Atlantic Philanthropies #23262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia presents a significant challenge to health systems and to the person and family affected. Home care is increasingly seen as a key service in addressing this challenge in a person-centred and cost-effective way. Intensive Home Care Packages (IHCPs) were introduced in Ireland to provide personalised and high levels of support for people with dementia to remain at home or be discharged home from hospital, and to build on the work of the HSE & Genio Dementia Programme. This realist evaluation is concerned with real world questions of feasibility and effectiveness; specifically understanding in what ways IHCPs work, how optimum outcomes are achieved, for whom and in what contexts do IHCPs work best.

methodsA mixed-method, multi-stakeholder study was designed within a realist evaluation conceptual framework. The process evaluation includes semi-structured interviews with health service staff at all levels, social network analysis and secondary database analysis; the outcomes evaluation includes quantitative measures and qualitative data collected through in-depth interviews with people with dementia and family carers; and the cost evaluation includes analysis of data from the Resource Utilisation in Dementia (RUD). The four stage cycle of realist evaluation is adopted, with iterative rounds of theory formulation, data collection and theory testing throughout. DISCUSSION: This realist evaluation of a complex intervention involves a variety of data and perspectives in order to provide confidence in moving from hypothetical constructs about how IHCPs might work to explanations of potential or observable causal mechanisms. In spite of being a key form of service delivery in most healthcare systems, the ways in which home care works to produce the desired outcomes seems to be poorly understood. While there is much descriptive and comparative work, there is a lack of understanding regarding which patient groups might benefit most from home care, or the influence of different service or cultural contexts on outcomes from home care. As well as addressing the core research objectives, this study aims to make a contribution to the underlying theory of home care in ways that can progress our understanding of how outcomes are produced for home care recipients.

Indexed as

CaregiversCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareDementiaFeasibility StudiesHome Care ServicesHumansIrelandPatient-Centered CareProgram EvaluationDementiaHome carePerson-centred careRealist evaluationStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID30384841
PMCPMC6211483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.