Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30384431›Full record

ReviewGenes2018

Aptamer Chimeras for Therapeutic Delivery: The Challenging Perspectives.

Carla Lucia Esposito, Silvia Catuogno, Gerolama Condorelli, Paola Ungaro, Vittorio de Franciscis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. RNA-TAG Mediated Protein-RNA Conjugation.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Therapeutic Potential of Aptamer-Protein Interactions.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Paving the Road for RNA Therapeutics.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carla Lucia EspositoIstituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale "G. Salvatore", Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), 80145 Naples, Italy. c.esposito@ieos.cnr.it.
Silvia CatuognoIstituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale "G. Salvatore", Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), 80145 Naples, Italy. s.catuogno@ieos.cnr.it.
Gerolama CondorelliDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, "Federico II" University of Naples, 80145 Naples, Italy. gecondor@unina.it.
Paola UngaroIstituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale "G. Salvatore", Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), 80145 Naples, Italy. pungaro@ieos.cnr.it.
Vittorio de FranciscisIstituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale "G. Salvatore", Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), 80145 Naples, Italy. defranci@unina.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleic acid-based aptamers have emerged as efficient delivery carriers of therapeutics. Thanks to their unique features, they can be, to date, considered one of the best targeting moieties, allowing the specific recognition of diseased cells and avoiding unwanted off-target effects on healthy tissues. In this review, we revise the most recent contributes on bispecific and multifunctional aptamer therapeutic chimeras. We will discuss key examples of aptamer-mediated delivery of nucleic acid and peptide-based therapeutics underlying their great potentiality and versatility. Achieved objectives and challenges will be highlighted as well.

Indexed as

aptamerchimerastargeted delivery

Identifiers

PMID30384431
PMCPMC6266988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.