Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30384177›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2018

Uncertainty in heart rate complexity metrics caused by R-peak perturbations.

Nicholas J Napoli, Matthew W Demas, Sanjana Mendu, Chad L Stephens, Kellie D Kennedy, Angela R Harrivel, Randall E Bailey, Laura E Barnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Leveraging intrinsic non-sinusoidal patterns to infer search behavior to predict exposure to respiratory stressors.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicholas J NapoliDept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University Virginia, Charlottesville, Va, 22904, United States; National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, Va, 23681, United States. Electronic address: njn5fg@virginia.edu.
Matthew W DemasSystems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va, 22904, United States. Electronic address: mwd8jf@virginia.edu.
Sanjana MenduSystems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va, 22904, United States. Electronic address: sm7gc@virginia.edu.
Chad L StephensNASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va, 23681, United States. Electronic address: chad.l.stephens@nasa.gov.
Kellie D KennedyNASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va, 23681, United States. Electronic address: kellie.d.kennedy@nasa.gov.
Angela R HarrivelNASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va, 23681, United States. Electronic address: angela.r.harrivel@nasa.gov.
Randall E BaileyNASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va, 23681, United States. Electronic address: randall.e.bailey@nasa.gov.
Laura E BarnesSystems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va, 22904, United States; Data Science Institute, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, United States. Electronic address: lb3d@virginia.edu.

Funding

Aeronautics NASA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart rate complexity (HRC) is a proven metric for gaining insight into human stress and physiological deterioration. To calculate HRC, the detection of the exact instance of when the heart beats, the R-peak, is necessary. Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals can often be corrupted by environmental noise (e.g., from electromagnetic interference, movement artifacts), which can potentially alter the HRC measurement, producing erroneous inputs which feed into decision support models. Current literature has only investigated how HRC is affected by noise when R-peak detection errors occur (false positives and false negatives). However, the numerical methods used to calculate HRC are also sensitive to the specific location of the fiducial point of the R-peak. This raises many questions regarding how this fiducial point is altered by noise, the resulting impact on the measured HRC, and how we can account for noisy HRC measures as inputs into our decision models. This work uses Monte Carlo simulations to systematically add white and pink noise at different permutations of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), time segments, sampling rates, and HRC measurements to characterize the influence of noise on the HRC measure by altering the fiducial point of the R-peak. Using the generated information from these simulations provides improved decision processes for system design which address key concerns such as permutation entropy being a more precise, reliable, less biased, and more sensitive measurement for HRC than sample and approximate entropy.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsComputer SimulationElectrocardiographyEntropyHeart RateHumansHypoxiaMonte Carlo MethodSignal-To-Noise RatioApproximate entropyECG noiseElectrocardiogram analysisFiducial markerHeart rate complexityPermutation entropyR-peak perturbationsSample entropy

Identifiers

PMID30384177
PMCPMC7814983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.