Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30383849›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses and reference equation validation to predict peak oxygen uptake for the incremental shuttle waking test in adolescent boys.

Andreza L Gomes, Vanessa A Mendonça, Tatiane Dos Santos Silva, Crislaine K V Pires, Liliana P Lima, Alcilene M Gomes, Ana Cristina R Camargos, Camila D C Neves, Ana C R Lacerda, Hércules R Leite

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreza L GomesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Campus JK, Alto da Jacuba, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Vanessa A MendonçaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Campus JK, Alto da Jacuba, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tatiane Dos Santos SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Campus JK, Alto da Jacuba, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Crislaine K V PiresPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Campus JK, Alto da Jacuba, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Liliana P LimaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Campus JK, Alto da Jacuba, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Alcilene M GomesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Campus JK, Alto da Jacuba, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ana Cristina R CamargosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Campus JK, Alto da Jacuba, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Camila D C NevesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Campus JK, Alto da Jacuba, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ana C R LacerdaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Campus JK, Alto da Jacuba, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Hércules R LeitePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Campus JK, Alto da Jacuba, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8977-8131
Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies speculated that the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test (ISWT) is a maximal test in children and adolescents, however comparison between ISWT with cardiopulmonary exercise test has not yet performed. Furthermore, there is no regression equation available in the current literature to predict oxygen peak consumption (VO2 peak) in this population. This study aimed to assesses and correlate the cardiorespiratory responses of the ISWT with the cardiopulmonary exercise (CEPT) and to develop and validate a regression equation to predict VO2 peak in healthy sedentary adolescent boys.

methodsForty-one participants were included in the study. In the first stage, the VO2 peak, respiratory exchange ratio (R peak), heart rate max (HR max) and percentage of predicted HR max (% predicted HR max) were evaluated in CEPT and ISWT (n = 26). Second, an equation was developed (n = 29) to predict VO2 peak. In both phases, the VO2 peak, respiratory exchange ratio R and hearth rate (HR) were evaluated. In the third stage, the validation equation was performed by another 12 participants.

resultsSimilar results in VO2 peak (P>0.05), R peak (P>0.05) and predicted maximum HR (P>0.05) were obtained between the ISWT and CEPT. Both tests showed moderate significant correlations of VO2 peak (r = 0.44, P = 0.002) e R peak (r = -0.53, P < 0.01), as well as the agreement of these measurements by Bland-Altman analysis (VO2 peak, bias = -0.13; R peak, bias = 0.0). Distance walked was the variable that explained 42.5% (R2 = 0.425, p = 0.0001) of the variance in VO2 peak. The equation was VO2 peak (predicted) = 20.94 + (0.02 x distance walked). The results obtained by the equation were not significantly different compared to the values obtained by the gas analyzer and the Bland-Altman analysis showed agreement (bias = 1.6).

conclusionThe ISWT produced maximal cardiorespiratory responses comparable to the CEPT, and the developed equation showed viability for the prediction of VO2 peak in healthy sedentary adolescent boys.

Indexed as

AdolescentCardiorespiratory FitnessCross-Sectional StudiesExercise ToleranceFeasibility StudiesHealthy VolunteersHeart RateHumansLinear ModelsMaleOxygen ConsumptionSedentary BehaviorStatistics, NonparametricWalk Test

Identifiers

PMID30383849
PMCPMC6211760
OpenAlexW2899484835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.