Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30383794›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Angiotensinogen rs5050 germline genetic variant as potential biomarker of poor prognosis in astrocytoma.

Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja, Sonia Iliana Mejía-Pérez, Nancy Reynoso-Noverón, Liliana Gómez-Flores-Ramos, Ernesto Soto-Reyes, Thalía Estefania Sánchez-Correa, Lissania Guerra-Calderas, Clementina Castro-Hernandez, Silvia Vidal-Millán, José Sánchez-Corona and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Glioma and Peptidergic Systems: Oncogenic and Anticancer Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Genetic Variations inJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexander Perdomo-PantojaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4981-8132
Sonia Iliana Mejía-PérezDepartamento de Neurocirugía, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, "Manuel Velasco Suarez", Mexico City, Mexico.
Nancy Reynoso-NoverónDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Liliana Gómez-Flores-RamosDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ernesto Soto-ReyesDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Thalía Estefania Sánchez-CorreaDepartamento de Neurocirugía, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, "Manuel Velasco Suarez", Mexico City, Mexico.
Lissania Guerra-CalderasDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Clementina Castro-HernandezUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM-INCAN, Mexico City, Mexico.
Silvia Vidal-MillánDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
José Sánchez-CoronaCentro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente, IMSS, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Lucia Taja-ChayebDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9592-8527
Olga GutiérrezDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Bernardo Cacho-DiazUnidad de Neuro-oncologia, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rosa Maria Alvarez-GomezDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Juan Luis Gómez-AmadorDepartamento de Neurocirugía, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, "Manuel Velasco Suarez", Mexico City, Mexico.
Patricia Ostrosky-WegmanInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Teresa CoronaLaboratorio Clínico de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Instituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirugia, "Manuel Velasco Suarez", Mexico City, Mexico.
Luis Alonso Herrera-MontalvoDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Talia Wegman-OstroskyDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3207-6697
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXInstituto de Neurologia Y Neurocirugia · CUInstituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía · MXJohns Hopkins University · USMexican Social Security Institute · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRenin-angiotensin system (RAS) in brain cancer represents a scarcely explored field in neuro-oncology. Recently, some pre- and clinical studies have reported that RAS components play a relevant role in the development and behavior of gliomas. The angiotensinogen (AGT) rs5050 genetic variant has been identified as a crucial regulator of the transcription of AGT mRNA, which makes it a logical and promising target of research. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the AGT rs5050 genetic variant in blood with prognosis in astrocytoma.

methodsA prospective pilot study was performed on forty-eight astrocytoma patients, who received the standard-of-care treatment. Blood samples were taken prior to surgery and DNA was sequenced using Ion Torrent next-generation sequencing and analyzed by Ion Reporter software. Descriptive, bivariate, multivariate, and survival analyses were performed using SPSS v21, STATA 12 and GraphPad Prism 7.

resultsMedian follow-up was 41 months (range 1-48). Survival analysis showed a significant difference between the rs5050 genotypes (p = .05). We found lower survival rates in individuals with the GG-genotype of rs5050 AGT compared to patients with the TT- and TG-genotype (2 months vs. 11.5 months, respectively [p = .01]). In bivariate and multivariate analyses, GG-genotype was negatively associated with survival.

conclusionsIn patients with astrocytoma, AGT rs5050 GG-genotype was associated with poor prognosis. We propose this germline genetic variant as a complementary biomarker, which can be detected practically and safely in blood samples or saliva.

Indexed as

Germ-Line MutationAdultAgedAngiotensinogenAstrocytomaBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene FrequencyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPrognosisAngiotensinogenBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID30383794
PMCPMC6211735
OpenAlexW2898885448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.