Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30383789›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

Slower environmental change hinders adaptation from standing genetic variation.

Thiago S Guzella, Snigdhadip Dey, Ivo M Chelo, Ania Pino-Querido, Veronica F Pereira, Stephen R Proulx, Henrique Teotónio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Phenotypic stasis with genetic divergence.Peer community journal · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genes and environments, development and time.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thiago S GuzellaInstitut de Biologie de l' École Normale Supérieure (IBENS), École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, Inserm, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1374-7379
Snigdhadip DeyInstitut de Biologie de l' École Normale Supérieure (IBENS), École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, Inserm, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Ivo M CheloInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5414-6625
Ania Pino-QueridoInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6830-4148
Veronica F PereiraInstitut de Biologie de l' École Normale Supérieure (IBENS), École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, Inserm, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Stephen R ProulxDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0307-1907
Henrique TeotónioInstitut de Biologie de l' École Normale Supérieure (IBENS), École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, Inserm, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1057-6882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary responses to environmental change depend on the time available for adaptation before environmental degradation leads to extinction. Explicit tests of this relationship are limited to microbes where adaptation usually depends on the sequential fixation of de novo mutations, excluding standing variation for genotype-by-environment fitness interactions that should be key for most natural species. For natural species evolving from standing genetic variation, adaptation at slower rates of environmental change may be impeded since the best genotypes at the most extreme environments can be lost during evolution due to genetic drift or founder effects. To address this hypothesis, we perform experimental evolution with self-fertilizing populations of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and develop an inference model to describe natural selection on extant genotypes under environmental change. Under a sudden environmental change, we find that selection rapidly increases the frequency of genotypes with high fitness in the most extreme environment. In contrast, under a gradual environmental change selection first favors genotypes that are worse at the most extreme environment. We demonstrate with a second set of evolution experiments that, as a consequence of slower environmental change and thus longer periods to reach the most extreme environments, genetic drift and founder effects can lead to the loss of the most beneficial genotypes. We further find that maintenance of standing genetic variation can retard the fixation of the best genotypes in the most extreme environment because of interference between them. Taken together, these results show that slower environmental change can hamper adaptation from standing genetic variation and they support theoretical models indicating that standing variation for genotype-by-environment fitness interactions critically alters the pace and outcome of adaptation under environmental change.

Indexed as

EnvironmentGene-Environment InteractionGenetic VariationAdaptation, BiologicalEvolution, MolecularGenetic FitnessGenetics, PopulationMutationReproducibility of ResultsSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID30383789
PMCPMC6233921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.