Observational studyMedicine2018
Comparative study of the maximum Watts factor and Schafer contractility grade, bladder contractility index in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Beyond urodynamics: non-invasive approaches to diagnosing detrusor underactivity in men with lower urinary tract symptoms - a systematic review.BMC urology · 2025Pooled it
- The examination of detrusor underactivity in multiple system atrophy.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate whether the maximum Watts factor (WF) is 1 parameter of describing detrusor contraction in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).We retrospectively reviewed urodynamic data of male subjects with LUTS. Data on age, maximum flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual (PVR), detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate (PdetQmax), maximum Watts factor (WFmax), and Schafer contractility grades were collected. First, all patients were divided into 6 groups according to Schafer contractility grade. The urodynamic parameters include WFmax and bladder contractility index (BCI) were compared and analyzed among the 6 groups by using Kruskal-Wallis test statistically. The box plot of Schafer contractility grade with WFmax or BCI were plotted and analyzed. Second, the correlation scatter diagram between WFmax and BCI was plotted and analyzed. Spearman's correlation test was performed. Third, we drew the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and confirmed the area under the curve, the Optimal Operating Point (OOP) and corresponding sensitivity and specificity for WFmax by the reference standard of Schafer contractility grade and BCI respectively.A total of 455 men were included. The mean age of patients was 57 ± 17.9 years, ranging from 18 to 87 years. Median of WFmax increased from 5.8 W/m in very week (VW) group to 19.5 W/m in strong (ST) group, while BCI rose from 70 to 170. The box plot of Schafer contractility grade with WFmax or BCI showed that both WFmax and BCI were positively correlated with Schafer contractility grade. Kruskal-Wallis test among the 6 groups showed statistically significant difference (P <.001). The correlation scatter diagram showed that WFmax increased significantly with BCI (), the linear regression equation being Y = 3.33 + 0.07X, R2 = 0.298. Spearman's correlation test revealed that WFmax and BCI were positively correlated, with the correlation coefficient being 0.616 (P <.001). The WFmax area under ROC curve by Schafer contractility grade was 0.894 and WFmax OOP was interpreted at 11.1 W/m. In addition, the area under ROC curve by BCI was 0.802 and WFmax OOP was interpreted at 9.8 W/m.Our findings suggestted that WFmax was a good parameter of evaluating detrusor contraction as well as Schafer contractility grade and BCI, which should be widely used in clinical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.