Observational studyMedicine2018
Successful treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation by recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical practice guidelines for management of disseminated intravascular coagulation in Japan 2024. Part 2: hematologic malignancy.International journal of hematology · 2025Guideline
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin for the treatment of DIC associated with hematological malignancies.International journal of hematology · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Hematopathological Patterns in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Complications of Overt Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Multifaceted Roles of Thrombomodulin: Anti-coagulation, Anti-inflammation, and Anti-tumor Potential.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia withOncology letters · 2024Article
- Article
- Diagnostic Scores and Treatment Options for Acute Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Children.Cureus · 2021Review
- Coagulopathy in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Can We Go Beyond Supportive Care?Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Review
- High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1): a pivotal regulator of hematopoietic malignancies.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2020Review
- Analysis of the role of thrombomodulin in all-trans retinoic acid treatment of coagulation disorders in cancer patients.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a life-threatening condition that frequently occurs in patients with hematologic malignancies. Currently, recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rTM) is a therapeutic DIC drug that is manufactured and sold in Japan only. We evaluated the efficacy of rTM compared to that of gabexate mesilate (GM), which was previously used routinely for treating DIC in Japan, in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This retrospective study enrolled 43 AML patients, including 17 with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), that was complicated with DIC. DIC resolution rates in non-APL AML and rTM-treated APL patients were 68.4% and 81.8%, respectively. In non-APL AML patients, the duration of rTM administration was significantly shorter than that of GM (7 vs 11 days), suggesting that rTM could improve DIC earlier than GM, although rTM was used in patients with more severe DIC. Moreover, treatment with rTM significantly improved DIC score, fibrinogen, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product (FDP), and prothrombin time (PT) ratio. Conversely, treatment with GM only improved the DIC score and FDP. In APL patients, the duration of rTM administration was also significantly shorter than that of GM. No severe side effects associated with the progression of bleeding were observed during rTM administration. These findings suggest that rTM is safe, and its anti-DIC effects are more prompt than GM for treating AML patients with DIC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.