Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30383638›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

The association between BMI and kidney cancer risk: An updated dose-response meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guideline.

Xuezhen Liu, Qi Sun, Haifeng Hou, Kai Zhu, Qian Wang, Huamin Liu, Qianqian Zhang, Long Ji, Dong Li

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xuezhen LiuSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University.
Qi SunTraditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Taian, Tai'an, China.
Haifeng HouSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University.
Kai ZhuSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University.
Qian WangSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University.
Huamin LiuSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University.
Qianqian ZhangSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University.
Long JiSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University.
Dong LiSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveObesity is considered as one of the risk factors of kidney cancer. However, the results are not consistent in reported original studies, as well as in published meta-analysis. This study aims to clarify the relationship between overweight/obesity and kidney cancer by an updated overall and dose-response meta-analysis.

methodsThis meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guideline. Relevant studies were searched using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The studies were limited to human cohort studies in English and Chinese language. Random-effect models and dose-response meta-analysis were used to synthesize the results. Subgroup analyses were also conducted based on the characteristics of participants.

resultsTwenty-four cohort studies with 8,953,478 participants were included in our meta-analysis. Compared to the normal weight, the pooled RRs of kidney cancer was 1.35 (1.27-1.43) in overweight and 1.76 (1.61-1.91) in obese participants. An increased kidney cancer risk of 1.06 (1.05-1.06) for each 1 kg/m increase in BMI was showed in dose-response meta-analysis. No significant heterogeneity was found across studies with I = 39.4% for overweight, and I = 43.3% for obesity.

conclusionThe overall and dose-response meta-analysis suggested that overweight/obesity increases the risk of kidney cancer both in men and women.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleObesityRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID30383638
PMCPMC6221676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.