SynthesisMedicine2018
Nuanxin capsule for heart failure: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of multifaceted optimization management for chronic heart failure: a multicentre, randomized controlled study.ESC heart failure · 2023Trial
- Identifying the Effect of Nuanxin Capsules on Myocardial Injury Induced by Chronic Hypoxia via Network Pharmacology Analysis and Experimental Validation.BioMed research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of Nuanxin capsule for patients with heart failure (HF).
methodsA systematic literature search was performed in 6 databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan-fang Data Information Site, Chinese BioMedical Database (CBM), VIP Chinese Science and Technique Journals Database from the date of its inception up to November 2016. Review Manager 5.2 software was used for assessment of risk of bias, data synthesis and subgroup analysis. Begg and Egger tests were used for assessing symmetries of funnel plot by software Stata 12.0. We conducted the GRADE system to assess the quality of evidence.
results12 trials involving 1418 participants were eligible. Compared with western medicine (WM) alone, Nuanxin capsule plus WM showed statistical significance in total effective rate (RR 1.18, 95% condidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.25). According to subgroup analysis, the 6-months group and the 12-months group have better effect than the 3-month group. As for 6-minute walking distance (6MWT), Nuanxin capsule plus WM compared with WM has significantly increased walking distance (weighted mean difference [WMD] 42.56, 95% CI 34.27-50.85). Nuanxin capsule plus WM has significantly decreased in mortality (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.18-0.46) and re-admission rate (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.39-0.60) compared with WM. Nuanxin capsule plus WM was beneficial for B-type natriuretic peptide (-240.47, 95% CI -332.45-148.49). gger's and Begg's test showed that there was no publication bias exist (P = .937). Influence analysis showed that no single study affected the overall result. The GRADE quality of the evidence was very low to Moderate across the different outcomes.
conclusionsDespite of the apparently positive findings, we cannot draw a sound conclusion that Nuanxin capsule has positive effect in patients with HF, because of the insufficient evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.