Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30383624›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of elemene in treating malignant pleural effusion caused by tumors: A PRISMA guided meta-analysis.

Qing-Tao Wang, Ze-Lin Zhang, Hui Xiong, Dong-Sheng Zhou, Jun Li, Jian Liang, Ya-Fei Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The Antitumor Efficacy ofBioMed research international · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Qing-Tao WangDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Breast Surgery, Xiang Yang No. 1 People's Hospital, HuBei University of Medicine, XiangYang, Hubei, P.R. China.
Ze-Lin Zhang
Hui Xiong
Dong-Sheng Zhou
Jun Li
Jian Liang
Ya-Fei Wang
Hubei University of Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveElemene is widely used to treat malignant pleural effusion in China. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of elemene in treating malignant pleural effusion.

methodsElectronic databases including Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and Chinese biomedical literature database were searched until March 2017. Clinical controlled trials (CCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of elemene in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion were included. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the quality evaluation criteria of the Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0.

resultsA total of 46 CCTs were included, with 2992 patients. Results of meta-analysis showed that elemene significantly improved the overall response rate (ORR) in controlling malignant pleural effusion (risk ratio [RR] = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.08-1.23; P < .05). Subgroup results showed that the ORR of elemene in the treatment of lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion (RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.34; P < .05) was higher than that of other cancers (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.05-1.23; P < .05). Meanwhile, elemene did not significantly increase the incidences of chest pain and fever (P > .05).

conclusionElemene is suggested to have the ability of improving the treatment outcome of malignant pleural effusion with acceptable safety.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDrugs, Chinese HerbalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPleural Effusion, MalignantSesquiterpenesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDrugs, Chinese HerbalelemeneSesquiterpenes

Identifiers

PMID30383624
PMCPMC6221679
OpenAlexW2898690505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.