Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30383545›Full record

ReviewClinical obstetrics and gynecology2019

Psychology of Chronic Pelvic Pain: Prevalence, Neurobiological Vulnerabilities, and Treatment.

Sara R Till, Sawsan As-Sanie, Andrew Schrepf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Management of Gynaecological Chronic Pelvic Pain in the Emergency Setting- A Scoping Review.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Role of Psychologists in Treating Pelvic Pain Conditions.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara R TillDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Sawsan As-SanieDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Andrew SchrepfAnesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

Peripheral and Central Nervous System Correlates of Persistent Post-Hysterectomy PainR01HD088712 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI AS-SANIE, SAWSAN, CLAUW, DANIEL J · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
University of Michigan's TMJD and Orofacial Pain Interdisciplinary ConsortiumK12DE023574 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CLAUW, DANIEL J, KAPILA, SUNIL D · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088712NIDCR NIH HHS K12 DE023574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with pelvic pain suffer from psychological conditions at a disproportionately high rate compared with their peers. We review environmental, genetic, inflammatory, and neurobiological factors that increase vulnerability to developing both of these conditions. We review treatment strategies for chronic pelvic pain in patients who have comorbid psychological conditions, including both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic options.

Indexed as

Antidepressive Agents, TricyclicAnxietyCatastrophizationChronic PainCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionFemaleGabapentinHumansOff-Label UsePelvic PainPrevalenceSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsTwin Studies as TopicAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicGabapentinSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30383545
PMCPMC6340718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.