Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30383189›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2018

How Gender Stereotypes May Limit Female Faculty Advancement in Communication Sciences and Disorders.

Nicole Rogus-Pulia, Ianessa Humbert, Christine Kolehmainen, Molly Carnes

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inequity in Peer Review in Communication Sciences and Disorders.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. State of the Practice of Team Science in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole Rogus-PuliaDivision of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Ianessa HumbertCollege of Health and Health Professions, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Swallowing Systems Core, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Christine KolehmainenDivision of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Molly CarnesDivision of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Maximizing Investigator's Research Award: Diversifying the Scientific WorkforceR35GM122557 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CARNES, MOLLY L. · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The field of communication sciences and disorders (CSD) faces a critical shortage of the faculty essential to train the future workforce of speech-language pathologists and audiologists. Despite a predominance of women in the field, men receive doctoral degrees, tenure status, academic leadership positions, and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association awards at disproportionately higher rates than women. The purpose of this review is to explore how implicit gender bias may contribute to female faculty advancement, including current and projected faculty workforce shortages, and to propose tangible solutions. Method: The authors present proportions of men and women who receive doctoral degrees, advance to each faculty rank, receive tenure status, hold department chairs in CSD, and receive American Speech-Language-Hearing Association honors and awards. They review ways in which cultural stereotypes give rise to implicit gender bias and discuss myriad ways that implicit gender bias may influence the decisions of students considering an academic career in CSD and their career trajectories. Conclusions: Cultural stereotypes about men and women lead to implicit gender bias that may have real consequences for female faculty advancement in CSD. Such implicit bias can influence career selection and outcomes within the field in multiple ways. To ensure that CSD continues to attract top talent and maintain a robust pipeline of future faculty in doctoral training programs, the field must recognize the existence of implicit gender bias and implement evidence-based strategies to minimize its potentially damaging effects on the future of the profession.

Indexed as

Career MobilityCommunication DisordersEducation, GraduateFacultySexismStereotypingAudiologistsCareer ChoiceFemaleHumansLeadershipMalePersonnel SelectionSpeech-Language Pathology

Identifiers

PMID30383189
PMCPMC6436457
OpenAlexW2898781238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.