ArticleJAMA internal medicine2018
Benefits and Harms of Antihypertensive Treatment in Low-Risk Patients With Mild Hypertension.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deprescribing antihypertensive medications in older people: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of a Walnut Diet on Office and 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Elderly Individuals.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2019Trial
- Association of Clinic Blood Pressure and Out-of-Clinic Blood Pressure Difference With Falls Among Older Adults With Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Article
- CureAPP HT is expected to be one piece of the puzzle that physicians and patients can work together to solve the problem of uncontrolled hypertension.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Online Health Information Seeking: Implications for Self-Management in Hypertension.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Comparison of Patients Classified as High-Risk between International Cardiovascular Disease Primary Prevention Guidelines.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events among adults with high predicted risk without established risk factors.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
- Blood pressure status, trajectories and cardiovascular disease: the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus prospective study.Open heart · 2024Article
- Therapeutical Approach to Arterial Hypertension - Current State of the Art.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Evaluating Blood Pressure Variability in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: An Insight into Non-Dipping Patterns and Their Clinical Implications.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- First-line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- The association between antihypertensive treatment and serious adverse events by age and frailty: A cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2023Article
- Quality of observational studies of clinical interventions: a meta-epidemiological review.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Review
- Effect of moderate to high intensity aerobic exercise on blood pressure in young adults: The TEPHRA open, two-arm, parallel superiority randomized clinical trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Article
- Effect of a Digitally-Enabled, Preventive Health Program on Blood Pressure in an Adult, Dutch General Population Cohort: An Observational Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Observational
- The association between bilirubin and hypertension among a Chinese ageing cohort: a prospective follow-up study.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- The importance of blood pressure thresholds versus predicted cardiovascular risk on subsequent rates of cardiovascular disease: a cohort study in English primary care.The lancet. Healthy longevity · 2022Article
- Feasibility study to assess the delivery of a novel isometric exercise intervention for people with stage 1 hypertension in the NHS: protocol for the IsoFIT-BP study including amendments to mitigate the risk of COVID-19.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2021Article
- Characteristics of Populations Excluded From Clinical Trials Supporting Intensive Blood Pressure Control Guidelines.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Initiating Pharmacological Treatment in Stage One Hypertension Based on 10-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Markov Modeling Study.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Evidence to support initiation of pharmacologic treatment in low-risk patients with mild hypertension is inconclusive, with previous trials underpowered to demonstrate benefit. Clinical guidelines across the world are contradictory. Objective: To examine whether antihypertensive treatment is associated with a low risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in low-risk patients with mild hypertension. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this longitudinal cohort study, data were extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, from January 1, 1998, through September 30, 2015, for patients aged 18 to 74 years who had mild hypertension (untreated blood pressure of 140/90-159/99 mm Hg) and no previous treatment. Anyone with a history of CVD or CVD risk factors was excluded. Patients exited the cohort if follow-up records became unavailable or they experienced an outcome of interest. Exposures: Prescription of antihypertensive medication. Propensity scores for likelihood of treatment were constructed using a logistic regression model. Individuals treated within 12 months of diagnosis were matched to untreated patients by propensity score using the nearest-neighbor method. Main Outcomes and Measures: The rates of mortality, CVD, and adverse events among patients prescribed antihypertensive treatment at baseline, compared with those who were not prescribed such treatment, using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: A total of 19 143 treated patients (mean [SD] age, 54.7 [11.8] years; 10 705 [55.9%] women; 10 629 [55.5%] white) were matched to 19 143 similar untreated patients (mean [SD] age, 54.9 [12.2] years; 10 631 [55.5%] female; 10 654 [55.7%] white). During a median follow-up period of 5.8 years (interquartile range, 2.6-9.0 years), no evidence of an association was found between antihypertensive treatment and mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.88-1.17) or between antihypertensive treatment and CVD (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.95-1.25). Treatment was associated with an increased risk of adverse events, including hypotension (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.30-2.20; number needed to harm at 10 years [NNH10], 41), syncope (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.50; NNH10, 35), electrolyte abnormalities (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.12-2.65; NNH10, 111), and acute kidney injury (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.00-1.88; NNH10, 91). Conclusions and Relevance: This prespecified analysis found no evidence to support guideline recommendations that encourage initiation of treatment in patients with low-risk mild hypertension. There was evidence of an increased risk of adverse events, which suggests that physicians should exercise caution when following guidelines that generalize findings from trials conducted in high-risk individuals to those at lower risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.