Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382941›Full record

RevieweLife2018

From molecular manipulation of domesticated

Severin Sasso, Herwig Stibor, Maria Mittag, Arthur R Grossman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CRISPR-Cas Technology TurnsMarine drugs · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The fluid dynamics and functional diversity of the flagella of free-living flagellates.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Unwrapping the Ciliary Coat: High-Resolution Structure and Function of the Ciliary Glycocalyx.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Severin SassoMatthias Schleiden Institute of Genetics, Bioinformatics and Molecular Botany, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2226-845X
Herwig StiborDepartment Biology II, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Maria MittagMatthias Schleiden Institute of Genetics, Bioinformatics and Molecular Botany, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Arthur R GrossmanCarnegie Instiution for Science, Stanford, United States.
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SA 2453/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 1127National Science Foundation NSF-MCB 0951094U.S. Department of Energy DE-FG02-07ER64427U.S. Department of Energy DE-FG02-12ER16338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the mid-20th century, the unicellular and genetically tractable green alga

Indexed as

Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiEcosystemGenomicsPhylogeographycell biologyChlamydomonas reinhardtiiCiliaecologyFunctional genomicsNatural historyPhotosynthesisSoil algae

Identifiers

PMID30382941
PMCPMC6211829
OpenAlexW2899073202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.