Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382932›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Survey of European pet owners quantifying endoparasitic infection risk and implications for deworming recommendations.

Jessica McNamara, Jason Drake, Scott Wiseman, Ian Wright

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hunting and Stray Dogs as Reservoirs ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Control of companion animal parasites and impact on One Health.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Zoonotic Risks of Sleeping with Pets.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. NexGardParasite (Paris, France) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica McNamaraElanco Animal Health, Lilly House, Priestley Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 9NL, UK.
Jason DrakeElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN, 46140, USA. drake_jon_j@elanco.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-0852
Scott WisemanElanco Animal Health, Lilly House, Priestley Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 9NL, UK.
Ian WrightMount Veterinary Practice, 1 Harris St, Fleetwood, FY7 6QX, UK.
Elanco (United States) · USThe Mount · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZoonotic endoparasites pose risks to pets and people. The European Scientific Counsel Companion Animal Parasites (ESCCAP) created risk groupings for dogs (A-D) and for cats (A-B), with the highest risk pets (Group D dogs and Group B cats) receiving the most frequent testing and/or deworming recommendations. Little information exists on current deworming behaviours across Europe, alignment to accepted guidelines and the percentage of dogs and cats falling into ESCCAP groups. The study objectives were to evaluate the reported infection-risk behaviours of dogs and cats and assesses whether deworming frequency reported by pet owners complied with recommended deworming frequencies.

methodsA total of 5001 pet owners from five different countries (France, Germany, Spain, Sweden and the UK) were surveyed regarding endoparasite infection risk and the frequency of deworming of dogs and cats. For the purposes of this study, ESCCAP risk groups for cats (A-B) were converted into four risk groups (A-D) using the additional risk factors outlined in the ESCCAP guidelines. This allowed direct comparison between cats and dogs as well as grouped higher risk cats into the appropriate deworming frequency.

resultsThe three most common risk factors identified for dogs were contact with: other dogs, snails or prey; children or the elderly; going off lead outside their own garden. 85-98% of all dogs had risks putting them into Group D, the highest risk group. The three most common risk factors identified for cats were: hunting; catching prey; contact with children or the elderly. Using these revised groups, 33-68% of cats were in Group D. Despite the majority of dogs and cats falling into a risk category where ESCCAP recommends monthly deworming, dogs and cats averaged 2.3 and 2.2 dewormings per year, respectively. This frequency was less than the four times a year dosing frequency demonstrated to be required to reduce zoonotic Toxocara spp. ova shedding.

conclusionsOverall, 93% of dogs and 54% of cats fell into Group D, the highest risk group. Deworming frequencies were considerably less than recommended by ESCCAP or required to both reduce zoonotic risk and improve pet health. Improved treatment compliance is needed.

Indexed as

AgedAnimalsCat DiseasesCatsChildDog DiseasesDogsFranceGermanyHumansPetsRisk FactorsSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenToxocaraCatsDewormingDogsEndoparasitesESSCAPParasite controlRisk assessmentToxocaraZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID30382932
PMCPMC6211546
OpenAlexW3144454770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.