ArticleParasites & vectors2018
Survey of European pet owners quantifying endoparasitic infection risk and implications for deworming recommendations.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hunting and Stray Dogs as Reservoirs ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Beyond the clinical eye: mapping intestinal parasitic infections and its risk factors among dogs and cats across Portugal.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Intestinal parasite prevalences in dogs and cats: a decade of retrospective data from a reference veterinary laboratory in Madrid, Spain.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- First quantitative assessment of the effects of parasite control in dogs and cats in the UK.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Efficacy of a novel chewable tablet (Credelio Quattro™) containing lotilaner, moxidectin, praziquantel, and pyrantel for the treatment and control of hookworm infections in dogs.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- A One Health Perspective on Multidrug Resistance Amongst Iberian Exotic Pet Owners.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Antibody response after feline panleukopenia virus vaccination in kittens with and without intestinal parasites.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Control of companion animal parasites and impact on One Health.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Review
- Of potential new treatment targets and polythetic approach in meningoencephalitis of unknown origin: a review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Review
- Canine gastrointestinal parasites perceptions, practices, and behaviours: A survey of dog owners in Australia.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Prevalence and public health relevance of enteric parasites in domestic dogs and cats in the region of Madrid (Spain) with an emphasis on Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium sp.Veterinary medicine and science · 2023Article
- Diversity and geographic distribution of haplotypes of Dirofilaria immitis across European endemic countries.Parasites & vectors · 2023Article
- Caring for Canines: A Survey of Dog Ownership and Parasite Control Practices in Ireland.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Zoonotic Risks of Sleeping with Pets.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Prevalence of major digestive and respiratory helminths in dogs and cats in France: results of a multicenter study.Parasites & vectors · 2022Article
- Detection of Giardia and helminths in Western Europe at local K9 (canine) sites (DOGWALKS Study).Parasites & vectors · 2022Article
- Improving the knowledge of high school students about zoonotic diseases from pets in Medellín-Colombia.Veterinary world · 2021Article
- Occurrence of Endoparasites in Adult Swedish Dogs: A Coprological Investigation.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- NexGardParasite (Paris, France) · 2021Article
- Prevalence and associated risk factors of Intestinal parasites in rural high-mountain communities of the Valle del Cauca-Colombia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundZoonotic endoparasites pose risks to pets and people. The European Scientific Counsel Companion Animal Parasites (ESCCAP) created risk groupings for dogs (A-D) and for cats (A-B), with the highest risk pets (Group D dogs and Group B cats) receiving the most frequent testing and/or deworming recommendations. Little information exists on current deworming behaviours across Europe, alignment to accepted guidelines and the percentage of dogs and cats falling into ESCCAP groups. The study objectives were to evaluate the reported infection-risk behaviours of dogs and cats and assesses whether deworming frequency reported by pet owners complied with recommended deworming frequencies.
methodsA total of 5001 pet owners from five different countries (France, Germany, Spain, Sweden and the UK) were surveyed regarding endoparasite infection risk and the frequency of deworming of dogs and cats. For the purposes of this study, ESCCAP risk groups for cats (A-B) were converted into four risk groups (A-D) using the additional risk factors outlined in the ESCCAP guidelines. This allowed direct comparison between cats and dogs as well as grouped higher risk cats into the appropriate deworming frequency.
resultsThe three most common risk factors identified for dogs were contact with: other dogs, snails or prey; children or the elderly; going off lead outside their own garden. 85-98% of all dogs had risks putting them into Group D, the highest risk group. The three most common risk factors identified for cats were: hunting; catching prey; contact with children or the elderly. Using these revised groups, 33-68% of cats were in Group D. Despite the majority of dogs and cats falling into a risk category where ESCCAP recommends monthly deworming, dogs and cats averaged 2.3 and 2.2 dewormings per year, respectively. This frequency was less than the four times a year dosing frequency demonstrated to be required to reduce zoonotic Toxocara spp. ova shedding.
conclusionsOverall, 93% of dogs and 54% of cats fell into Group D, the highest risk group. Deworming frequencies were considerably less than recommended by ESCCAP or required to both reduce zoonotic risk and improve pet health. Improved treatment compliance is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.