Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2018
Consistent effects of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: additional findings from the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial.
Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02686034 (A Prospective, Multi-centre, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Study of gammaCore® Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulator), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multi-centre, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Study of gammaCore® Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulator (nVNS), for the Acute Treatment of Migraine
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Cluster Headache and Migraine: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2025Pooled it
- Non-invasive neuromodulation in the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy of transauricular vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: a randomized controlled exploratory study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Trial
- Saliva molecular inflammatory profiling in female migraine patients responsive to adjunctive cervical non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation: the MOXY Study.Journal of translational medicine · 2019Trial
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Sleep Disorders: Emerging Evidence and Future Directions.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Review
- Is canonical SD a clinically relevant model of migraine? Argument pro.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Spreading depolarization as a therapeutic target in migraine.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
- Article
- Therapeutic observation of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for chronic migraine in pediatric patients: a case report.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation is associated with the reduction in persistent post-concussion symptoms: an observational study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Vagus nerve stimulation as a predictive coding modulator that enhances feedforward over feedback transmission.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2025Review
- Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation effects on chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.Pain reports · 2024Review
- Effect of acupuncture combined with auricular beanembedding on autonomic nervous system function, heart rate variability and mental state of migraine patients.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Ischemic Stroke.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023Review
- Effects of Non-Invasive Neuromodulation of the Vagus Nerve for the Management of Cluster Headache: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Inflammation Responses to Bone Scaffolds under Mechanical Stimuli in Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation for migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Management of auricular transcutaneous neuromodulation and electro-acupuncture of the vagus nerve for chronic migraine: a systematic review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Human organ donor-derived vagus nerve biopsies allow for well-preserved ultrastructure and high-resolution mapping of myelinated and unmyelinated fibers.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) has been shown to be practical, safe, and well tolerated for treating primary headache disorders. The recent multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled PRESTO trial provided Class I evidence that for patients with episodic migraine, nVNS significantly increases the probability of having mild pain or being pain-free 2 h post stimulation. We report additional pre-defined secondary and other end points from PRESTO that demonstrate the consistency and durability of nVNS efficacy across a broad range of outcomes.
methodsAfter a 4-week observation period, 248 patients with episodic migraine with/without aura were randomly assigned to acute treatment of migraine attacks with nVNS (n = 122) or a sham device (n = 126) during a double-blind period lasting 4 weeks (or until the patient had treated 5 attacks). All patients received nVNS therapy during the subsequent 4-week/5-attack open-label period.
resultsThe intent-to-treat population consisted of 243 patients. The nVNS group (n = 120) had a significantly greater percentage of attacks treated during the double-blind period that were pain-free at 60 (P = 0.005) and 120 min (P = 0.026) than the sham group (n = 123) did. Similar results were seen for attacks with pain relief at 60 (P = 0.025) and 120 min (P = 0.018). For the first attack and all attacks, the nVNS group had significantly greater decreases (vs sham) in pain score from baseline to 60 min (P = 0.029); the decrease was also significantly greater for nVNS at 120 min for the first attack (P = 0.011). Results during the open-label period were consistent with those of the nVNS group during the double-blind period. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse device effects was low across all study periods, and no serious AEs occurred.
conclusionsThese results further demonstrate that nVNS is an effective and reliable acute treatment for multiple migraine attacks, which can be used safely while preserving the patient's option to use traditional acute medications as rescue therapy, possibly decreasing the risk of medication overuse. Together with its practicality and optimal tolerability profile, these findings suggest nVNS has value as a front-line option for acute treatment of migraine.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02686034 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.