Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382896›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018

Diverse RNA interference strategies in early-branching metazoans.

Andrew D Calcino, Selene L Fernandez-Valverde, Ryan J Taft, Bernard M Degnan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. SmithRNAs: A Common Feature among Metazoa.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Small RNAs in Cnidaria: A review.Evolutionary applications · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Single individual structural variant detection uncovers widespread hemizygosity in molluscs.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploiting somatic piRNAs inLife science alliance · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. MicroRNAs: From Mechanism to Organism.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrew D CalcinoSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Selene L Fernandez-ValverdeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Ryan J TaftInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Bernard M DegnanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. b.degnan@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7573-8518
The University of Queensland · AUQueensland University of Technology · AUUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicro RNAs (miRNAs) and piwi interacting RNAs (piRNAs), along with the more ancient eukaryotic endogenous small interfering RNAs (endo-siRNAs) constitute the principal components of the RNA interference (RNAi) repertoire of most animals. RNAi in non-bilaterians - sponges, ctenophores, placozoans and cnidarians - appears to be more diverse than that of bilaterians, and includes structurally variable miRNAs in sponges, an enormous number of piRNAs in cnidarians and the absence of miRNAs in ctenophores and placozoans.

resultsHere we identify thousands of endo-siRNAs and piRNAs from the sponge Amphimedon queenslandica, the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis using a computational approach that clusters mapped small RNA sequences and annotates each cluster based on the read length and relative abundance of the constituent reads. This approach was validated on 11 small RNA libraries in Drosophila melanogaster, demonstrating the successful annotation of RNAi-associated loci with properties consistent with previous reports. In the non-bilaterians we uncover seven new miRNAs from Amphimedon and four from Nematostella as well as sub-populations of candidate cis-natural antisense transcript (cis-NAT) endo-siRNAs. We confirmed the absence of miRNAs in Mnemiopsis but detected an abundance of endo-siRNAs in this ctenophore. Analysis of putative piRNA structure suggests that conserved localised secondary structures in primary transcripts may be important for the production of mature piRNAs in Amphimedon and Nematostella, as is also the case for endo-siRNAs.

conclusionTogether, these findings suggest that the last common ancestor of extant animals did not have the entrained RNAi system that typifies bilaterians. Instead it appears that bilaterians, cnidarians, ctenophores and sponges express unique repertoires and combinations of miRNAs, piRNAs and endo-siRNAs.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionRNA InterferenceAnimalsCtenophoraDrosophilaGene LibraryGenomeMicroRNAsMolecular Sequence AnnotationRNA, Small InterferingSea AnemonesMicroRNAsRNA, Small InterferingCnidarianCtenophoreDemospongeEndo-siRNAmiRNANon-bilaterianpiRNARNAi

Identifiers

PMID30382896
PMCPMC6211395
OpenAlexW2950067929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.