Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382856›Full record

ReviewGlobalization and health2018

Expanding global access to essential medicines: investment priorities for sustainably strengthening medical product regulatory systems.

Lukas Roth, Daniel Bempong, Joseph B Babigumira, Shabir Banoo, Emer Cooke, David Jeffreys, Lombe Kasonde, Hubert G M Leufkens, John C W Lim, Murray Lumpkin and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Globalization and health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Lukas RothUnited States Pharmacopeia, Rockville, USA.
Daniel BempongUnited States Pharmacopeia, Rockville, USA.
Joseph B BabigumiraGlobal Medicines Program, School of Pharmacy, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Shabir BanooRight to Care, South African Health Products Regulatory Authority, Cape Town, South Africa.
Emer CookeWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
David JeffreysInternational Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations Regulatory Science Committee, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lombe KasondeWorld Bank, Washington, USA.
Hubert G M LeufkensDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
John C W LimCentre of Regulatory Excellence, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Murray LumpkinBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, USA.
Gugu MahlanguMedicines Control Authority Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Rosanna W PeelingLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Helen ReesSouth African Health Products Regulatory Authority, University of Witwatersand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Margareth Ndomondo-SigondaNew Partnership for Africa's Development, Midrand, South Africa.
Andy StergachisGlobal Medicines Program, School of Pharmacy, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Mike WardWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jude NwokikePromoting the Quality of Medicines program, United States Pharmacopeia, Rockville, USA. jin@usp.org.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to quality-assured medical products improves health and save lives. However, one third of the world's population lacks timely access to quality-assured medicines while estimates indicate that at least 10% of medicine in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are substandard or falsified (SF), costing approximately US$ 31 billion annually. National regulatory authorities are the key government institutions that promote access to quality-assured medicines and combat SF medical products but despite progress, regulatory capacity in LMICs is still insufficient. Continued and increased investment in regulatory system strengthening (RSS) is needed. We have therefore reviewed existing global normative documents and resources and engaged with our networks of global partners and stakeholders to identify three critical challenges being faced by NRAs in LMICs that are limiting access to medical products and impeding detection of and response to SF medicines. The challenges are; implementing value-added regulatory practices that best utilize available resources, a lack of timely access to new, quality medical products, and limited evidence-based data to support post-marketing regulatory actions. To address these challenges, we have identified seven focused strategies; advancing and leveraging convergence and reliance initiatives, institutionalizing sustainability, utilizing risk-based approaches for resource allocation, strengthening registration efficiency and timeliness, strengthening inspection capacity and effectiveness, developing and implementing risk-based post-marketing quality surveillance systems, and strengthening regulatory management of manufacturing variations. These proposed solutions are underpinned by 13 focused recommendations, which we believe, if financed, technically supported and implemented, will lead to stronger health system and as a consequence, positive health outcomes.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesDrugs, EssentialGlobal HealthHealth PrioritiesHumansLegislation, DrugDrugs, EssentialAccess to essential medicinesRegulatory system strengtheningSubstandard and falsified

Identifiers

PMID30382856
PMCPMC6211488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.