Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382840›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

A fast detection of fusion genes from paired-end RNA-seq data.

Trung Nghia Vu, Wenjiang Deng, Quang Thinh Trac, Stefano Calza, Woochang Hwang, Yudi Pawitan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characteristics of fusion genes in breast cancer.Cancer cell international · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Integrative Chimeric RNA Prediction with FASfuse.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. OnACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cancer genomics & proteomics
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trung Nghia VuDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7945-5750
Wenjiang DengDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden.
Quang Thinh TracDepartment of Computational Sciences and Engineering, VNU University of Engineering and Technology, Xuan Thuy, 144, Hanoi, 84024, Vietnam.
Stefano CalzaDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Viale Europa, 11, Brescia, 25125, Italy.
Woochang HwangData Science for Knowledge Creation Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-747, South Korea.
Yudi PawitanDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden. Yudi.Pawitan@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFusion genes are known to be drivers of many common cancers, so they are potential markers for diagnosis, prognosis or therapy response. The advent of paired-end RNA sequencing enhances our ability to discover fusion genes. While there are available methods, routine analyses of large number of samples are still limited due to high computational demands.

resultsWe develop FuSeq, a fast and accurate method to discover fusion genes based on quasi-mapping to quickly map the reads, extract initial candidates from split reads and fusion equivalence classes of mapped reads, and finally apply multiple filters and statistical tests to get the final candidates. We apply FuSeq to four validated datasets: breast cancer, melanoma and glioma datasets, and one spike-in dataset. The results reveal high sensitivity and specificity in all datasets, and compare well against other methods such as FusionMap, TRUP, TopHat-Fusion, SOAPfuse and JAFFA. In terms of computational time, FuSeq is two-fold faster than FusionMap and orders of magnitude faster than the other methods.

conclusionsWith this advantage of less computational demands, FuSeq makes it practical to investigate fusion genes in large numbers of samples. FuSeq is implemented in C++ and R, and available at https://github.com/nghiavtr/FuSeq for non-commercial uses.

Indexed as

Gene FusionSequence Analysis, RNAAlgorithmsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDatabases, Nucleic AcidGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeoplasmsOncogene Proteins, FusionReproducibility of ResultsRNAOncogene Proteins, FusionRNAFusion equivalence classFusion geneQuasi-mappingRNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30382840
PMCPMC6211471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.