Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382827›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2018

Mothers' Facebook posts about infant health: findings from the Grow2Gether study.

Stacey Kallem, Rachel S Gruver, Senbagam Virudachalam, Alexander G Fiks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Newborn Health: Resources for New Mothers: A Webliography.Journal of consumer health on the Internet · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stacey KallemPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. kallems@email.chop.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9485-0759
Rachel S GruverDivison of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 2716 South Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19146, USA.
Senbagam VirudachalamPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexander G FiksPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Shared Decision Making in ADHDK23HD059919 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI FIKS, ALEXANDER GABRIEL · 2009 to 2013
$631k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD059919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media is a common way for mothers to seek advice about their infants. However, little is known about how low-income urban mothers use social media to obtain infant health information and whether this information is consistent with expert pediatric recommendations.

objectives(1) identify the types of health questions asked by low-income mothers of infants in a social media parenting group; (2) describe whether peer answers are consistent with or contradict AAP guidelines; (3) identify the practices that mothers post about that are inconsistent with AAP guidelines.

methodsForty-three low-income mothers were enrolled in Grow2Gether, a private Facebook group intervention focused on infant care and moderated by a psychologist. All health questions posted by mothers were coded thematically; answers to questions from the group were assessed for consistency with American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines related to infant feeding, sleep, screen time, and safety. Additionally, all unique posts that contained practices inconsistent with these AAP guidelines were thematically coded.

resultsIn total, 215 posts were coded. Participants posted 61 questions related to infant health, most commonly solid food introduction (8/61), teething (8/61), and breastfeeding (7/61). Of the 77 answers given by peers, 6 contradicted guidelines. Separately, mothers had 73 posts demonstrating practices inconsistent with AAP guidelines [safe sleep (43/73) and screen time (21/73)].

conclusionsMothers' Facebook group interactions in the context of an infant care intervention revealed that when mothers posed direct questions regarding infant health, their peers generally gave answers that did not contradict AAP guidelines. In contrast, mothers' posts simply describing sleep and screen time practices commonly contradicted guidelines.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfant CarePeer GroupSocial MediaAdultFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInfantMothersParentingPovertyPractice Guidelines as TopicUrban PopulationYoung AdultAnticipatory guidanceInfant careParentingRecommendationsSocial mediaUnderserved

Identifiers

PMID30382827
PMCPMC6208013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.