Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382746›Full record

ArticlePsychological services2019

Peer support specialists' experiences of microaggressions.

Ruth L Firmin, Susan Mao, Chyrell D Bellamy, Larry Davidson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological services, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruth L FirminDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Susan MaoDepartment of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Chyrell D BellamyProgram for Recovery and Community Health, Yale Department of Psychiatry.
Larry DavidsonProgram for Recovery and Community Health, Yale Department of Psychiatry.

Funding

Cognitive and Affective Dysfunctions in the PsychosesT32MH096682 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NUECHTERLEIN, KEITH H · 2013 to 2018
$1.1M
National Institute of Mental Health T32 MH096682NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH096682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microaggressions and their consequences have been observed among people with mental illness. However, little is known about ways in which peer support specialists, those with lived experience who also provide mental health services, experience microaggressions or the impacts of these experiences. Using an online survey of open-ended questions, peer support specialists (N = 65) provided examples of microaggressions they have experienced on the job and described the frequency of these experiences, the content of messages they received, and their responses and coping strategies. Data were coded using directed content analysis. Participants across a wide range of facilities and geographic locations reported experiencing microaggressions in the workplace. The content of microaggressions fell into 2 domains: (1) negative messages about the nature of having a mental illness and disclosing this information to others and (2) negative messages about the role of peer support specialists. Peers' responses to microaggressions included feeling isolated, seeking social support, employing coping strategies, and demonstrating resiliency and increased motivation to do peer work. Some peers, however, also reported leaving positions due to these experiences. Findings indicate that microaggressions are a common experience for peer support specialists that can have a detrimental impact on their sense of self and role as mental health specialists. Despite this, peers sought out support, identified coping strategies, and exhibited resiliency. Findings have implications for ways to better support peers in their roles as support specialists. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

IncivilityPeer GroupSpecializationAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedAggressionFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPrejudiceWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID30382746
PMCPMC6494735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.