Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382743›Full record

Trial reportPsychological services2019

Development and pilot study of a suicide prevention intervention delivered by peer support specialists.

Paul N Pfeiffer, Cheryl King, Mark Ilgen, Dara Ganoczy, Rebecca Clive, James Garlick, Kristen Abraham, H Myra Kim, Eduardo Vega, Brian Ahmedani and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological services, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. From Plan to Practice: Embedding Safety Planning in Inpatient Mental Health Care.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Peer-Led Models Focussed on Emotional Distress and Suicide Prevention: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul N PfeifferDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School.
Cheryl KingDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School.
Mark IlgenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School.
Dara GanoczyVA Center for Clinical Management Research.ORCID 0000-0002-5467-7629
Rebecca CliveDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School.ORCID 0000-0001-8799-9854
James GarlickDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School.
Kristen AbrahamVA Center for Clinical Management Research.
H Myra KimVA Center for Clinical Management Research.ORCID 0000-0002-0604-8027
Eduardo VegaRecovery, Action! International.
Brian AhmedaniHenry Ford Health System.
Marcia ValensteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School.
University of Michigan · USVA Center for Clinical Management Research · USActionAid · USHenry Ford Health System · US

Funding

Peer mentorship to reduce suicide risk following psychiatric hospitalizationR34MH103447 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PFEIFFER, PAUL NELSON · 2014 to 2016
$698k
National Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute of Mental Health R34 MH103447NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH103447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide rates in the United States have been increasing in recent years, and the period after an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization is one of especially high risk for death by suicide. Peer support specialists may play an important role in addressing recommendations that suicide prevention activities focus on protective factors by improving hope and connectedness. The present study developed a peer specialist intervention titled Peers for Valued Living (PREVAIL) to reduce suicide risk, incorporating components of motivational interviewing and psychotherapies targeting suicide risk into recovery-based peer support. A randomized controlled pilot study was conducted to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity of the intervention. A total of 70 adult psychiatric inpatients at high risk for suicide were enrolled into the study. Participants were randomized to usual care (n = 36) or to the 12-week PREVAIL peer support intervention (n = 34). Those in the PREVAIL arm completed an average of 6.1 (SD = 5.0) peer sessions over the course of 12 weeks. Fidelity was rated for 20 peer support sessions, and 85% of the peer specialist sessions demonstrated adequate fidelity to administering a conversation tool regarding hope, belongingness, or safety, and 72.5% of general support skills (e.g., validation) were performed with adequate fidelity. Participants' qualitative responses (n = 23) were highly positive regarding peer specialists' ability to relate, listen, and advise and to provide support specifically during discussions about suicide. Findings demonstrate that a peer support specialist suicide prevention intervention is feasible and acceptable for patients at high risk for suicide. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

CounselingPeer GroupSocial SupportSpecializationSuicide PreventionAdultFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30382743
PMCPMC6494743
OpenAlexW2898926407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.