Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382730›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2019

Past and future preference reversals are predicted by delay discounting in smokers and non-smokers.

Derek A Pope, Lindsey Poe, Jeffrey S Stein, Sarah E Snider, Alexander G Bianco, Warren K Bickel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Derek A PopeAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute.
Lindsey PoeAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute.
Jeffrey S SteinAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute.
Sarah E SniderAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute.
Alexander G BiancoAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute.
Warren K BickelAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute.
Virginia Tech · USCarilion Clinic · US

Funding

Self-Control Improvement Intervention (SCII): Improving Abstinence in SmokersR01DA034755 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
National Institutes of HealthNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034755Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delay discounting, the devaluation of delayed reinforcers, is one defining behavioral economic characteristic of cigarette smokers. Attempts at abstinence by smokers that result in relapse are conceptualized in this framework as preference reversals. Despite preference reversals being predicted by delay discounting models, little research has investigated the association between discount rate and preference reversals. The present study extended this research by examining the relation between discounting and preference reversals. Because previous research indicates that cigarette smokers discount at higher rates than controls and that past and future discounting are symmetrical, the present study assessed the relation between these two processes when hypothetical money was distanced in the past and future, respectively. These assessments of delay discounting and preference reversals were adapted from Yi, Matusiewicz, and Tyson (2016) and examined in 68 smokers and 68 nonsmokers using the crowdsourcing program Amazon Mechanical Turk. Smokers discounted both past and future hypothetical money more steeply than demographically matched controls. Smokers switched preference from the smaller-sooner (SS) to the larger-later (LL) outcome more slowly than nonsmokers, consistent with smokers' steeper delay discounting. For each group, significant positive correlations between past and future discount rates and past and future preference reversals was obtained. The overall pattern of results illustrate symmetry between past and future discounting and preference reversals, respectively and that discount rate is positively associated with the timing of preference reversals. Importantly, the results confirm that cigarette smokers discount more and reverse preference from a SS to a LL reward later than controls. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision MakingDelay DiscountingAdultCrowdsourcingEconomics, BehavioralFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleNon-SmokersRewardSecondary PreventionSmokersSmoking Cessation

Identifiers

PMID30382730
PMCPMC6355364
OpenAlexW2899121687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.