ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2019
Occipitotemporal representations reflect individual differences in conceptual knowledge.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct Hippocampal Mechanisms Support Concept Formation and Updating.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Presentation of numerical uncertainty modulates duration judgments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adaptive stretching of representations across brain regions and deep learning model layers.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Type of feedback affects formation of prototype or exemplar representations.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Coordinating multiple mental faculties during learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reconciling category exceptions through representational shifts.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Prototype or Exemplar Representations in the 5/5 Category Learning Task.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Role of Attention in Category Representation.Cognitive science · 2024Article
- Testing cognitive theories with multivariate pattern analysis of neuroimaging data.Nature human behaviour · 2023Review
- Bidirectional influences of information sampling and concept learning.Psychological review · 2022Article
- Identifying the neural dynamics of category decisions with computational model-based functional magnetic resonance imaging.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Article
- The Costs and Benefits of Goal-Directed Attention in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.Computational brain & behavior · 2021Article
- Subjective value and decision entropy are jointly encoded by aligned gradients across the human brain.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Is an artificial limb embodied as a hand? Brain decoding in prosthetic limb users.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Ventromedial prefrontal cortex compression during concept learning.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Measures of Neural Similarity.Computational brain & behavior · 2020Article
- The role of uncertainty in attentional and choice exploration.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2019Article
- Explicit Categorization Goals Affect Attention-Related Processing of Race and Gender During Person Construal.Journal of experimental social psychology · 2019Article
- Occipitotemporal representations reflect individual differences in conceptual knowledge.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Through selective attention, decision-makers can learn to ignore behaviorally irrelevant stimulus dimensions. This can improve learning and increase the perceptual discriminability of relevant stimulus information. Across cognitive models of categorization, this is typically accomplished through the inclusion of attentional parameters, which provide information about the importance assigned to each stimulus dimension by each participant. The effect of these parameters on psychological representation is often described geometrically, such that perceptual differences over relevant psychological dimensions are accentuated (or stretched), and differences over irrelevant dimensions are down-weighted (or compressed). In sensory and association cortex, representations of stimulus features are known to covary with their behavioral relevance. Although this implies that neural representational space might closely resemble that hypothesized by formal categorization theory, to date, attentional effects in the brain have been demonstrated through powerful experimental manipulations (e.g., contrasts between relevant and irrelevant features). This approach sidesteps the role of idiosyncratic conceptual knowledge in guiding attention to useful information sources. To bridge this divide, we used formal categorization models, which were fit to behavioral data, to make inferences about the concepts and strategies used by individual participants during decision-making. We found that when greater attentional weight was devoted to a particular visual feature (e.g., "color"), its value (e.g., "red") was more accurately decoded from occipitotemporal cortex. We also found that this effect was sufficiently sensitive to reflect individual differences in conceptual knowledge, indicating that occipitotemporal stimulus representations are embedded within a space closely resembling that formalized by classic categorization theory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.