Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382594›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2019

Protein Intake and Disability Trajectories in Very Old Adults: The Newcastle 85+ Study.

Nuno Mendonça, Antoneta Granic, Tom R Hill, Mario Siervo, John C Mathers, Andrew Kingston, Carol Jagger

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Validation of the German version of the Protein Screener 55.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nuno MendonçaInstitute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7589-9901
Antoneta GranicInstitute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Tom R HillHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Mario SiervoInstitute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
John C MathersInstitute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Andrew KingstonInstitute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Carol JaggerInstitute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre · GBNewcastle Hospitals - Campus for Ageing and Vitality · GBThe Neurosciences Foundation · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G0500997Medical Research Council MR/J50001X/1Medical Research Council MR/L016354/1Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether protein intake is associated with better disability trajectories in the oldest adults (≥85) and whether muscle mass and muscle strength would partially mediate this.

designProspective cohort study.

settingNewcastle-upon-Tyne and North Tyneside, United Kingdom.

participantsCommunity-dwelling older adults aged 85 at baseline (N=722).

methodsProtein intake was estimated using two 24-hour multiple-pass recalls at baseline. Disability was measured as difficulty performing 17 activities of daily living at baseline and 18, 36, and 60 months. Trajectories were derived using mortality-adjusted group-based trajectory modelling. The effect of protein intake (g/kg of adjusted body weight (aBW)/d) on disability trajectories was examined using multinomial logistic regression.

resultsParticipants had 4 distinct disability trajectories (between the ages of 85 and 90: constant very low (AT1), mild (AT2), moderate (AT3), and severe (AT4). Each unit increase in protein (g) per kg of aBW/d was associated with greater odds of AT1 (odds ratio (OR=7.97, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.96-32.43, p = .004) and AT2 (OR=3.28, 95% CI=1.09-9.87, p = .03) than of AT4 over 5 years in models adjusted for selected covariates. Participants with protein intake of 1.0 g/kg aBW/d or more were more likely to belong to AT1 (OR=3.65, 95% CI=1.59-8.38, p = .009) and AT2 (OR=2.12, 95% CI=1.16-3.90, p = .01) than to AT4.

conclusionHigher protein intake, especially 1.0 g/kg aBW/d or more, was associated with better disability trajectories in the oldest adults. These findings will inform new dietary strategies to support active, healthy ageing. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:50-56, 2019.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationGeriatric AssessmentPhysical Functional PerformanceAged, 80 and overBody WeightDietary ProteinsFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMuscle StrengthProspective StudiesUnited KingdomDietary Proteinsaged, 80 and overdisabilitymalnutritionproteinvery old

Identifiers

PMID30382594
PMCPMC6334273
OpenAlexW2899420884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.