ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2019
A pilot evaluation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite for clinical practice (EPIC-CP) tool in Ontario.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What are the attitudes of health professionals regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in oncology practice? A mixed-method synthesis of the qualitative evidence.BMC health services research · 2020Pooled it
- Privacy preserving digital platform for patient reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) to Describe Symptom Burden Associated with Breast Cancer and Related Treatments: A Cross-Sectional Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- An Actionable Expert-System Algorithm to Support Nurse-Led Cancer Survivorship Care: Algorithm Development Study.JMIR cancer · 2023Article
- Missingness in the expanded prostate cancer index short form (EPIC-26) - prevalence, patterns, and explanatory factors.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2023Article
- Striving to Fill in Gaps between Clinical Practice and Standards: The Evolution of a Pan-Canadian Approach to Patient-Reported Outcomes Use.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- The expanded prostate cancer index composite short form (EPIC-26) for measuring health-related quality of life: content analysis of patients' spontaneous comments written in survey margins.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Clinical research associates experience with missing patient reported outcomes data in cancer randomized controlled trials.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Feasibility of implementing a cervix cancer-specific patient-reported outcome measure in routine ambulatory clinics.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Selecting, implementing and evaluating patient-reported outcome measures for routine clinical use in cancer: the Cancer Care Ontario approach.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2020Article
- Assessment of a patient-reported outcome measure in men with prostate cancer who had radical surgery: a Rasch analysis.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Understanding frictions in patient-reported outcome-based community healthcare - An institutional logics perspective.Digital healthArticle
- Use of patient-reported outcomes in regional cancer centres over time: a retrospective study.CMAJ openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo introduce the EPIC-CP symptom screening tool in routine ambulatory cancer care, and to evaluate its acceptability and perceived usefulness from the perspective of patients and clinicians.
methodsEligible prostate cancer patients from four cancer centres were recruited (November 2014-June 2015) from radiation or surgical oncology clinics. A physician and/or health care professional reviewed the EPIC-CP results as part of the clinical encounter. Patient experience with the tool was evaluated using a nine-item Patient Exit Survey (PES). Clinician experience was evaluated through semi-structured qualitative interviews. Patient and clinician results were compared to identify common themes.
resultsA total of 333 patients were enrolled, of whom, 287 completed the PES. Most patients had one clinical encounter, although the number of EPIC-CP assessments ranged from 1 to 11 per patient, for a total of 937 EPIC-CP questionnaires completed. Item completion rates were high (91-100%), with items addressing sexual health among the lowest (91-92%). On the PES, most patients (70%) agreed with the item: "Completing this questionnaire helped me tell the clinicians about how I have been feeling". Thematic analysis from clinician interviews revealed that the EPIC-CP captures essential prostate-specific effects that facilitated person-centred communication and customization of interventions. Targeted clinical education and patient resources were seen as necessary for uptake.
conclusionsEPIC-CP was generally endorsed by clinicians and patients. The implementation of a disease-specific measure in place of a generic symptom screening tool has the potential to improve the quality of the clinical encounter and provide outcome measures for further health services research. Provincial implementation of this tool as a standard of care is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30382479What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.