Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382466›Full record

ArticleBiogerontology2019

Extensive growth is followed by neurodegenerative pathology in the continuously expanding adult zebrafish retina.

Jessie Van Houcke, Emiel Geeraerts, Sophie Vanhunsel, An Beckers, Lut Noterdaeme, Marijke Christiaens, Ilse Bollaerts, Lies De Groef, Lieve Moons

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biogerontology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Fish Models of Ageing Retinal Disease.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. C9ORF72 Deficiency Results in Neurodegeneration in the Zebrafish Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessie Van HouckeNeural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 61, Box 2464, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Emiel GeeraertsNeural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 61, Box 2464, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Sophie VanhunselNeural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 61, Box 2464, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
An BeckersNeural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 61, Box 2464, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Lut NoterdaemeNeural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 61, Box 2464, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Marijke ChristiaensNeural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 61, Box 2464, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Ilse BollaertsNeural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 61, Box 2464, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Lies De GroefNeural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 61, Box 2464, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Lieve MoonsNeural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 61, Box 2464, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. lieve.moons@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0186-1411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of effective treatments for age-related neurodegenerative diseases remains one of the biggest medical challenges today, underscoring the high need for suitable animal model systems to improve our understanding of aging and age-associated neuropathology. Zebrafish have become an indispensable complementary model organism in gerontology research, yet their growth-control properties significantly differ from those in mammals. Here, we took advantage of the clearly defined and highly conserved structure of the fish retina to study the relationship between the processes of growth and aging in the adult zebrafish central nervous system (CNS). Detailed morphological measurements reveal an early phase of extensive retinal growth, where both the addition of new cells and stretching of existent tissue drive the increase in retinal surface. Thereafter, and coinciding with a significant decline in retinal growth rate, a neurodegenerative phenotype becomes apparent,-characterized by a loss of synaptic integrity, an age-related decrease in cell density and the onset of cellular senescence. Altogether, these findings support the adult zebrafish retina as a valuable model for gerontology research and CNS disease modeling and will hopefully stimulate further research into the mechanisms of aging and age-related pathology.

Indexed as

AgingNeurodegenerative DiseasesRetinaAnimalsCellular SenescenceCentral Nervous SystemDisease Models, AnimalZebrafishAgingGrowthNeurodegenerationNeurogenesisRetinaZebrafish

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.