Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382410›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2018

Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosis from Retinal Images Using Modified Hopfield Neural Network.

D Jude Hemanth, J Anitha, Le Hoang Son, Mamta Mittal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D Jude HemanthDepartment of ECE, Karunya University, Coimbatore, India.
J AnithaDepartment of ECE, Karunya University, Coimbatore, India.
Le Hoang SonVNU Information Technology Institute, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam. sonlh@vnu.edu.vn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6356-0046
Mamta MittalG.B. Pant Govt. Engineering College, Okhla, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease diagnosis from medical images has become increasingly important in medical science. Abnormality identification in retinal images has become a challenging task in medical science. Effective machine learning and soft computing methods should be used to facilitate Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosis from Retinal Images. Artificial Neural Networks are widely preferred for Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosis from Retinal Images. It was observed that the conventional neural networks especially the Hopfield Neural Network (HNN) may be inaccurate due to the weight values are not adjusted in the training process. This paper presents a new Modified Hopfield Neural Network (MHNN) for abnormality classification from human retinal images. It relies on the idea that both weight values and output values can be adjusted simultaneously. The novelty of the proposed method lies in the training algorithm. In conventional method, the weights remain fixed but the weights are changing in the proposed method. Experimental performed on the Lotus Eye Care Hospital containing 540 images collected showed that the proposed MHNN yields an average sensitivity and specificity of 0.99 and accuracy of 99.25%. The proposed MHNN is better than HNN and other neural network approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosis from Retinal Images.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAgedAlgorithmsDiabetic RetinopathyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityClassification accuracyDisease diagnosisHopfield neural networkRetinal images

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.