Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382329›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2019

Identification of the pedunculopontine nucleus and surrounding white matter tracts on 7T diffusion tensor imaging, combined with histological validation.

D J H A Henssen, D Kuppens, F J A Meijer, A M van Cappellen van Walsum, Y Temel, E Kurt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tractography patterns of pedunculopontine nucleus deep brain stimulation.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D J H A HenssenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. dylan.henssen@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3915-3034
D KuppensDepartment of Neurosurgery, Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
F J A MeijerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A M van Cappellen van WalsumDepartment of Anatomy, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Noord 25, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Y TemelDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
E KurtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) has been studied as a possible target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, identifying the PPN can be challenging as the PPN is poorly visualized on conventional or even high-resolution MR scans. From histological studies it is known that the PPN is surrounded by major white matter tracts, which could function as possible anatomical landmarks.

methodsThis study aimed to localize the PPN using 7T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of its white matter borders in one post-mortem brain. Histological validation of the same specimen was performed. The PPN was segmented in both spaces, after which the two masks were compared using the Dice Similarity Index (DSI). The DSI compared the similarity of two samples on an inter-individual level and validated the MR findings. The error in distance between the center of the two 3D segmentations was measured by use of the Euclidean distance.

resultsThe PPN can be found in between the superior cerebellar peduncle and the medial lemniscus on both the FA-maps of the DTI images and the histological sections. The histological transverse sections showed to be superior to recognize the PPN (DSI: 1.0). The DTI images have a DSI of 0.82. The overlap-masks of both spaces showed a DSI of 0.32, whereas the concatenation-masks of both spaces showed a remarkable overlap, a DSI of 0.94. Euclidean distance of the overlap- and concatenation-mask in the two spaces showed to be 1.29 mm and 1.59 mm, respectively.

conclusionThis study supports previous findings that the PPN can be identified using FA-maps of DTI images. For possible clinical application in DBS localization, in vivo validation of the findings of our study is needed.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overBrain MappingCadaverDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPedunculopontine Tegmental NucleusWhite MatterDeep brain stimulationDiffusion tensor imagingParkinson’s diseasePedunculopontine nucleus

Identifiers

PMID30382329
PMCPMC6514272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.