Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382196›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2018

Electrical spinal cord stimulation must preserve proprioception to enable locomotion in humans with spinal cord injury.

Emanuele Formento, Karen Minassian, Fabien Wagner, Jean Baptiste Mignardot, Camille G Le Goff-Mignardot, Andreas Rowald, Jocelyne Bloch, Silvestro Micera, Marco Capogrosso, Gregoire Courtine

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 206 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
25.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04052776 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Acute Effects of Pharmacological Neuromodulation on Leg Motor Activity in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury Treated With Epidural Electrical Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisRan2020 to 2023Enrolled3ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Drug EffectArmsBuspirone, Levodopa-Carbidopa, Buspirone + Levodopa-Carbidopa, Placebo oral tablet
NCT04807764 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Priming With High-Frequency Trans-spinal Stimulation to Augment Locomotor Benefits in Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorCity University of New YorkRan2021 to 2024Enrolled14ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Paraplegia, Spinal, Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis, Paraplegia, SpasticArmsStanding transspinal stimulation followed by robotic gait training, Lying transspinal stimulation followed by robotic gait training, Standing sham transspinal stimulation followed by robotic gait training
NCT05942339 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Study on Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of the ARC Therapy Using the ARC-IM Lumbar System to Support Mobility in People With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneRan2023 to 2027Enrolled8ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsProcedure/Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 356 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Emanuele FormentoBertarelli Foundation Chair in Translational NeuroEngineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Karen MinassianCenter for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Fabien WagnerCenter for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9582-6109
Jean Baptiste MignardotCenter for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0614-0453
Camille G Le Goff-MignardotCenter for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4402-527X
Andreas RowaldCenter for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jocelyne BlochDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Silvestro MiceraBertarelli Foundation Chair in Translational NeuroEngineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marco CapogrossoDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Sciences, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0975-316X
Gregoire CourtineCenter for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. gregoire.courtine@epfl.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-4142
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Fribourg · CHScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) of the spinal cord restores locomotion in animal models of spinal cord injury but is less effective in humans. Here we hypothesized that this interspecies discrepancy is due to interference between EES and proprioceptive information in humans. Computational simulations and preclinical and clinical experiments reveal that EES blocks a significant amount of proprioceptive input in humans, but not in rats. This transient deafferentation prevents modulation of reciprocal inhibitory networks involved in locomotion and reduces or abolishes the conscious perception of leg position. Consequently, continuous EES can only facilitate locomotion within a narrow range of stimulation parameters and is unable to provide meaningful locomotor improvements in humans without rehabilitation. Simulations showed that burst stimulation and spatiotemporal stimulation profiles mitigate the cancellation of proprioceptive information, enabling robust control over motor neuron activity. This demonstrates the importance of stimulation protocols that preserve proprioceptive information to facilitate walking with EES.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleHumansLocomotionModels, BiologicalMuscle, SkeletalProprioceptionRatsSpinal CordSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord StimulationWalking

Identifiers

PMID30382196
PMCPMC6268129
OpenAlexW2898777639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.