ArticleScientific reports2018
"Infostery" analysis of short molecular dynamics simulations identifies highly sensitive residues and predicts deleterious mutations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding variants of uncertain significance in systemic autoinflammatory diseases.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Cysteine hyperoxidation rewires communication pathways in the nucleosome and destabilizes the dyad.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Structural determination of Streptococcus pyogenes M1 protein interactions with human immunoglobulin G using integrative structural biology.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Predicting substitutions to modulate disorder and stability in coiled-coils.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Data-guided Multi-Map variables for ensemble refinement of molecular movies.The Journal of chemical physics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterizing a protein mutational landscape is a very challenging problem in Biology. Many disease-associated mutations do not seem to produce any effect on the global shape nor motions of the protein. Here, we use relatively short all-atom biomolecular simulations to predict mutational outcomes and we quantitatively assess the predictions on several hundreds of mutants. We perform simulations of the wild type and 175 mutants of PSD95's third PDZ domain in complex with its cognate ligand. By recording residue displacements correlations and interactions, we identify "communication pathways" and quantify them to predict the severity of the mutations. Moreover, we show that by exploiting simulations of the wild type, one can detect 80% of the positions highly sensitive to mutations with a precision of 89%. Importantly, our analysis describes the role of these positions in the inter-residue communication and dynamical architecture of the complex. We assess our approach on three different systems using data from deep mutational scanning experiments and high-throughput exome sequencing. We refer to our analysis as "infostery", from "info" - information - and "steric" - arrangement of residues in space. We provide a fully automated tool, COMMA2 ( www.lcqb.upmc.fr/COMMA2 ), that can be used to guide medicinal research by selecting important positions/mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.