Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30382154›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2019

Knowledge, motivations, expectations, and traits of an African, African-American, and Afro-Caribbean sequencing cohort and comparisons to the original ClinSeq

Katie L Lewis, Alexis R Heidlebaugh, Sandra Epps, Paul K J Han, Kristen P Fishler, William M P Klein, Ilana M Miller, David Ng, Charlotte Hepler, Barbara B Biesecker and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Future-oriented Emotions and Decisions to Receive Genomic Testing Results Among U.S. Adults of African Ancestry.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Perspectives of diverse Spanish- and English-speaking patients on the clinical use of polygenic risk scores.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The ACMG SF v3.0 gene list increases returnable variant detection by 22% when compared with v2.0 in the ClinSeq cohort.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katie L LewisNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. lewiskatie@mail.nih.gov.
Alexis R HeidlebaughNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sandra EppsNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Paul K J HanMaine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, Portland, ME, USA.
Kristen P FishlerNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
William M P KleinNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ilana M MillerNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
David NgNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Charlotte HeplerNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Barbara B BieseckerNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Leslie G BieseckerNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Human Genome Research Institute · USMaine Medical Center · USRTI International · US

Funding

Genomic Ascertainment - Molecular and Genetic AspectsZIAHG200359 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIESECKER, LESLIE · 2009 to 2025
$19.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRacial minority populations are underrepresented in genomics research. This study enrolled African-descended individuals in a sequencing study and reported their characteristics.

methodsWe purposively recruited 467 individuals self-identified as African, African American, or Afro-Caribbean to the ClinSeq

resultsRecruitment took five years and 83% of enrollees completed the survey. Participants had modest knowledge about benefits and limitations of sequencing (x̅s = 5.1, ranges: 0-10), and less than the original cohort (x̅ = 7.5 and 7.7, respectively). Common motivations to enroll were learning information relevant to personal health (49%) or family members' health (33%), and most had realistic expectations of sequencing. Like the original cohort, they had high levels of optimism, openness, and resilience.

conclusionEarly adopters may have relatively consistent personality traits irrespective of majority/minority status and recruitment methods, but high levels of genomics knowledge are not universal. Research should determine whether recruitment and consent procedures provide adequate education to promote informed choices and realistic expectations, which are vital to ethical research and increasing genomics research participation in underrepresented communities.

Indexed as

AdultAttitudeBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleCaribbean RegionCohort StudiesEthnicityFemaleGenome, HumanGenomicsGenotypeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKnowledgeMaleMiddle Ageddiversityearly adoptersgenome sequencinginformed choicerecruitment

Identifiers

PMID30382154
PMCPMC7721818
OpenAlexW2899115385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.