Author Correction: Assessing animal affect: an automated and self-initiated judgement bias task based on natural investigative behaviour.

Samantha Jones, Vikki Neville, Laura Higgs, Elizabeth S Paul, Peter Dayan, Emma S J Robinson, Michael Mendl

Abstract readPublished Erratum

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

Erratum for
Assessing animal affect: an automated and self-initiated judgement bias task based on natural investigative behaviour.2018

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samantha JonesCentre for Behavioural Biology, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, BS40 5DU, UK.

Vikki NevilleCentre for Behavioural Biology, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, BS40 5DU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-1353

Laura HiggsCentre for Behavioural Biology, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, BS40 5DU, UK.

Elizabeth S PaulCentre for Behavioural Biology, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, BS40 5DU, UK.

Peter DayanGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, 25 Howland Street, London, W1T 4JG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3476-1839

Emma S J RobinsonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK.

Michael MendlCentre for Behavioural Biology, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, BS40 5DU, UK. mike.mendl@bris.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5302-1871

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K00008X/1

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.

Identifiers

PMID30382135

DOI10.1038/s41598-018-34498-1

PMCPMC6210189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.