Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30381997›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurotrauma2019

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Resting-State Network Targeting for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Pilot Study.

Shan H Siddiqi, Nicholas T Trapp, Carl D Hacker, Timothy O Laumann, Sridhar Kandala, Xin Hong, Ludwig Trillo, Pashtun Shahim, Eric C Leuthardt, Alexandre R Carter and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurotrauma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07775586 (Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Wearable Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Home-Based Treatment of Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07775586 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Wearable Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Home-Based Treatment of Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Mental Health CenterRan2026 to 2028Enrolled124ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsrTMS-Tiny Treatment, Sham Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Neuromodulatory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) changes functional connectivity proportional to the electric-field induced by the TMS pulse.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shan H Siddiqi1 Department of Neurology, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts.
Nicholas T Trapp6 Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Carl D Hacker4 Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Timothy O Laumann3 Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sridhar Kandala3 Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Xin Hong5 Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Ludwig Trillo3 Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Pashtun Shahim2 Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, National Institutes of Health/Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences Traumatic Brain Injury Research Group, Bethesda, Maryland.
Eric C Leuthardt4 Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Alexandre R Carter5 Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
David L Brody2 Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, National Institutes of Health/Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences Traumatic Brain Injury Research Group, Bethesda, Maryland.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has demonstrated antidepressant efficacy but has limited evidence in depression associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Here, we investigate the use of rTMS targeted with individualized resting-state network mapping (RSNM) of dorsal attention network (DAN) and default mode network (DMN) in subjects with treatment-resistant depression associated with concussive or moderate TBI. The planned sample size was 50 with first interim analysis planned at 20, but only 15 were enrolled before the study was terminated for logistical reasons. Subjects were randomized to 20 sessions of bilateral rTMS (4000 left-sided excitatory pulses, 1000 right-sided inhibitory pulses) or sham. Treatment was targeted to the dorsolateral prefrontal cluster with maximal difference between DAN and DMN correlations based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging with individualized RSNM. Mean improvement in the primary outcome, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), was 56% ± 14% (n = 9) with active treatment and 27% ± 25% (n = 5) with sham (Cohen's d = 1.43). One subject randomized to sham withdrew before starting treatment. There were no seizures or other significant adverse events. MADRS improvement was inversely correlated with functional connectivity between the right-sided stimulation site and the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC; r = -0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.925). Active treatment led to increased sgACC-DMN connectivity (d = 1.55) and increased sgACC anti-correlation with the left- and right-sided stimulation sites (d = -1.26 and -0.69, respectively). This pilot study provides evidence that RSNM-targeted rTMS is feasible in TBI patients with depression. Given the dearth of existing evidence-based treatments for depression in this patient population, these preliminarily encouraging results indicate that larger controlled trials are warranted.

Indexed as

AdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticBrain MappingDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationdepressionfMRIrTMSTBI

Identifiers

PMID30381997
PMCPMC6909726
OpenAlexW2898834153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.