Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30381981›Full record

ArticleJournal of learning disabilities

A Longitudinal Analysis of the Trajectories and Predictors of Word Reading and Reading Comprehension Development Among At-Risk Readers.

Peng Peng, Douglas Fuchs, Lynn S Fuchs, Amy M Elleman, Devin M Kearns, Jennifer K Gilbert, Donald L Compton, Eunsoo Cho, Samuel Patton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of learning disabilities. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting Reading Fluency Growth from Grade 2 to Age 23 with Parental and Child Factors.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Peng Peng1 University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Douglas Fuchs2 Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Lynn S Fuchs2 Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Amy M Elleman3 Middle Tennessee State University, Mufreesboro, USA.
Devin M Kearns4 University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA.
Jennifer K Gilbert2 Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Donald L Compton5 Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.
Eunsoo Cho6 Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Samuel Patton2 Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University · USFlorida State University · USMichigan State University · USMiddle Tennessee State University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

THREE-TIERED PREVENTION MODEL TO BETTER SERVE ALL STUDENP30HD015052 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 1985 to 2014
$18.6M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Using RTI to address Risk, Providing Prevention,& Identifying Reading DisabilityR01HD056109 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FUCHS, DOUG · 2009 to 2013
$2.7M
Word Problems, Language, & Comorbid Learning DisabilitiesP20HD075443 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FUCHS, LYNN S · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P20 HD075443NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD015052NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD056109NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored the developmental trajectories and predictors of word reading and reading comprehension among young at-risk readers. In fall of first grade, 185 students identified as at-risk for reading difficulties were assessed on measures of domain-specific skills (phonological awareness, letter knowledge, and vocabulary), domain-general skills (working memory, nonverbal reasoning, and processing speed), and word reading and reading comprehension. Word reading and reading comprehension were assessed again in spring of grades 1-4. Individual growth curve modeling showed that the children demonstrated decelerated growth on word reading and linear growth on reading comprehension, although their performance on both word reading and reading comprehension were consistently below average on national norms. After controlling for word reading and reading comprehension in first grade, letter knowledge predicted growth in word reading; vocabulary and nonverbal reasoning predicted growth in reading comprehension. That is, we found different developmental trajectories and different predictors for word reading and reading comprehension among our at-risk sample. Implications are discussed for theory and early reading instruction for at-risk children.

Indexed as

Academic PerformancePsycholinguisticsReadingChildChild DevelopmentComprehensionDyslexiaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleat-risk readersdomain-specific and domain-general skillsreading comprehensionreading developmentword reading

Identifiers

PMID30381981
PMCPMC6445730
OpenAlexW2899300849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.