Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30381916›Full record

ReviewBrain tumor research and treatment2018

Current Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography of Brain Tumors.

Ji Hoon Jung, Byeong Cheol Ahn

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain tumor research and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Radiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. The utility ofReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Article
  6. PET Use in Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  7. KSNM60 in Clinical Nuclear Oncology.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. First-in-human study of anEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. PET/CT in pediatric oncology.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ji Hoon JungDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
Byeong Cheol AhnDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea. abc2000@knu.ac.kr.
Kyungpook National University Hospital · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2014R1A5A2009242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumors represent a diverse spectrum of histology, biology, prognosis, and treatment options. Although MRI remains the gold standard for morphological tumor characterization, positron emission tomography (PET) can play a critical role in evaluating disease status. This article focuses on the use of PET with radiolabeled glucose and amino acid analogs to aid in the diagnosis of tumors and differentiate between recurrent tumors and radiation necrosis. The most widely used tracer is ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Although the intensity of FDG uptake is clearly associated with tumor grade, the exact role of FDG PET imaging remains debatable. Additionally, high uptake of FDG in normal grey matter limits its use in some low-grade tumors that may not be visualized. Because of their potential to overcome the limitation of FDG PET of brain tumors, ¹¹C-methionine and ¹⁸F-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (FDOPA) have been proposed. Low accumulation of amino acid tracers in normal brains allows the detection of low-grade gliomas and facilitates more precise tumor delineation. These amino acid tracers have higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting brain tumors and differentiating recurrent tumors from post-therapeutic changes. FDG and amino acid tracers may be complementary, and both may be required for assessment of an individual patient. Additional tracers for brain tumor imaging are currently under development. Combinations of different tracers might provide more in-depth information about tumor characteristics, and current limitations may thus be overcome in the near future. PET with various tracers including FDG, ¹¹C-methionine, and FDOPA has improved the management of patients with brain tumors. To evaluate the exact value of PET, however, additional prospective large sample studies are needed.

Indexed as

¹⁸F-FDG¹⁸F-FDOPABrain tumorsC-11 methioninePositron emission tomography-computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID30381916
PMCPMC6212689
OpenAlexW2899341110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.