Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30381844›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2018

Testing for Bartonella ssp. DNA in cerebrospinal fluid of dogs with inflammatory central nervous system disease.

Lisa R Bartner, Stephanie McGrath, Adam Drury, Annie V Chen, Arianne Morris, Melissa Brewer, Meri Hall, Michael R Lappin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Role ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa R BartnerFrom the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Stephanie McGrathFrom the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7610-9297
Adam DruryFrom the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Annie V ChenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
Arianne MorrisFrom the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Melissa BrewerFrom the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Meri HallDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
Michael R LappinFrom the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1605-9667
Colorado State University · USWashington State University · US

Funding

CSU Center for Companion Animal Studies Young Investigator Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurobartonellosis occurs in people. The role these organisms might play in inflammatory brain disease of dogs is unclear. HYPOTHESIS/

objectivesThat Bartonella spp. DNA would be amplified more commonly from the CSF of dogs with inflammatory disease compared to those with noninflammatory disease. To report the prevalence of Bartonella spp. in dogs with and without inflammatory CNS disease with a commercially available PCR assay. ANIMALS: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from 172 dogs from either Washington State University or Colorado State University.

methodsRetrospective study. A search was performed of all medical records from dogs with CSF samples submitted to CSU's Center for Companion Animal Studies or Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory from CSU or WSU for Toxoplasma or Neospora PCR assay. Increased CSF nucleated cell counts and an adequate volume of CSF must have been present to evaluate Bartonella spp. by PCR assay.

resultsInflammatory CNS disease was confirmed in 65 dogs, none of which were positive for Bartonella spp. DNA. Of the other 107 dogs, one was positive for B. henselae DNA. The CSF from this dog contained red blood cells. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Failure to amplify Bartonella spp. DNA from the CSF of the dogs with inflammatory disease suggests the organism was not involved in the etiology of the disease, the organism was in the CNS tissues but not in the CSF, or the organism was present but in quantities undetectable by this PCR assay. The combination of PCR and culture is the most sensitive way to detect Bartonella spp. and the use of that technique should be considered in future studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBartonellaBartonella InfectionsCase-Control StudiesCentral Nervous System Bacterial InfectionsDNA, BacterialDog DiseasesDogsFemaleMalePolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, BacterialbartonellosisencephalomyelitismeningitisPCRprotozoal

Identifiers

PMID30381844
PMCPMC6271302
OpenAlexW2898936298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.