Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30381431›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Latent Factors and Dynamics in Motor Cortex and Their Application to Brain-Machine Interfaces.

Chethan Pandarinath, K Cora Ames, Abigail A Russo, Ali Farshchian, Lee E Miller, Eva L Dyer, Jonathan C Kao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tracking the topology of neural manifolds across populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The speech neuroprosthesis.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  20. Identifying Distinct Neural Features between the Initial and Corrective Phases of Precise Reaching Using AutoLFADS.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chethan PandarinathWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, chethan@gatech.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1241-1432
K Cora AmesDepartment of Neuroscience.ORCID 0000-0003-0657-0162
Abigail A RussoDepartment of Neuroscience.
Ali FarshchianDepartment of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611.ORCID 0000-0001-9321-0944
Lee E MillerDepartment of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611.ORCID 0000-0001-8675-7140
Eva L DyerWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30322.ORCID 0000-0002-6962-524X
Jonathan C KaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and.

Funding

Primate model of an intracortically controlled FES prostR01NS053603 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KENNEDY, ANN KATHRYN, MILLER, LEE · 2006 to 2021
$7.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS053603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 1960s, Evarts first recorded the activity of single neurons in motor cortex of behaving monkeys (Evarts, 1968). In the 50 years since, great effort has been devoted to understanding how single neuron activity relates to movement. Yet these single neurons exist within a vast network, the nature of which has been largely inaccessible. With advances in recording technologies, algorithms, and computational power, the ability to study these networks is increasing exponentially. Recent experimental results suggest that the dynamical properties of these networks are critical to movement planning and execution. Here we discuss this dynamical systems perspective and how it is reshaping our understanding of the motor cortices. Following an overview of key studies in motor cortex, we discuss techniques to uncover the "latent factors" underlying observed neural population activity. Finally, we discuss efforts to use these factors to improve the performance of brain-machine interfaces, promising to make these findings broadly relevant to neuroengineering as well as systems neuroscience.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain-Computer InterfacesHumansMotor CortexMovementNeuronsTime Factorsbrain-machine interfacesdynamical systemsmachine learningmotor controlmotor cortexneural population dynamics

Identifiers

PMID30381431
PMCPMC6209846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.