Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30381383›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Bands of brothers and in-laws: Waorani warfare, marriage and alliance formation.

Shane J Macfarlan, Pamela I Erickson, James Yost, Jhanira Regalado, Lilia Jaramillo, Stephen Beckerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Strategic intergroup alliances increase access to a contested resource in male bottlenose dolphins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  3. Fighting force and experience combine to determine contest success in a warlike mammal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Turkana warriors' call to arms: how an egalitarian society mobilizes for cattle raids.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Key individuals catalyse intergroup violence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Proximate Causes of Waorani Warfare.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shane J MacfarlanDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, 270 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA shane.macfarlan@anthro.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6332-9829
Pamela I EricksonDepartment of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, 354 Mansfield Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
James YostLatigo Ranch, PO Box 237, Kremmling, CO 80459, USA.
Jhanira RegaladoMuseo de Historia Natural, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Ladrón de Guevara E11, Casilla 17-01-2759, Quito 170517, Ecuador.
Lilia JaramilloCarretera Panamericana, Entrada a Lasso, Cotopaxi, Ecuador.
Stephen BeckermanDepartment of Anthropology, Penn State University, 410 Carpenter Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The root of modern human warfare lies in the lethal coalitionary violence of males in small-scale societies. However, there is a paucity of quantitative data concerning the form and function of coalitionary violence in this setting. Debates exist over how lethal coalitions are constituted, as well as the motivations and benefits for males to join such groups. Data from a lowland Amazonian population, the Waorani of Ecuador, illuminate three issues: (i) the degree to which raiding parties are composed of groups of fraternal kin as opposed to strategic alliances of actual or potential affinal kin; (ii) the extent to which individuals use pre-existing affinal ties to motivate others to participate in war or leverage warfare as a mechanism to create such ties; and (iii) the extent to which participation in raiding is driven by rewards associated with future marriage opportunities. Analyses demonstrate that Waorani raiding parties were composed of a mix of males who were potential affines, actual affines and fraternal kin, suggesting that men used pre-existing genetic, lineal and social kin ties for recruiting raid partners and used raiding as a venue to create novel social relationships. Furthermore, analyses demonstrate that males leveraged raiding alliances to achieve marriage opportunities for themselves as well as for their children. Overall, it appears that a complex set of motivations involving individual rewards, kin marriage opportunities, subtle coercion and the assessment of alliance strength promote violent intergroup conflict among the Waorani. These findings illustrate the complex inter-relationships among kin selection, coalition building and mating success in our species.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAdolescentAdultAnthropology, CulturalChildEcuadorFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMarriageMiddle AgedWarfarealliance formationmale coalitionsmarriageWaoraniwarfare

Identifiers

PMID30381383
PMCPMC6235029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.